starting_at_the_bottom
Legend
Silver Level
So, what table layout would you like given the following players, given game is 4nl-10nl.
V1 - Passive calling station - losing player
V2 - Passive calling station - losing player
V3 - TAG - winning player
V4 - TAG - winning player
V5 - LAG - little known
Personally I would prefer
V3
V4
V5
V1
V2
Hero
Ie we have postition 5/6 times on V2, and V3 has position 5/6 times on us.
Reasoning, money moves clockwise, we have direct position on one losing player and second position on the other. The LAG player might be able to feed their money to V1&V2 when they get called down by ATC.
V3 and V4 are good players that have position on us. The key here is that they and hero are tight, so they will not be in a lot of hands together, and being TAG at these stakes they will likely be playing their hand pretty face up.
Thoughts?
V1 - Passive calling station - losing player
V2 - Passive calling station - losing player
V3 - TAG - winning player
V4 - TAG - winning player
V5 - LAG - little known
Personally I would prefer
V3
V4
V5
V1
V2
Hero
Ie we have postition 5/6 times on V2, and V3 has position 5/6 times on us.
Reasoning, money moves clockwise, we have direct position on one losing player and second position on the other. The LAG player might be able to feed their money to V1&V2 when they get called down by ATC.
V3 and V4 are good players that have position on us. The key here is that they and hero are tight, so they will not be in a lot of hands together, and being TAG at these stakes they will likely be playing their hand pretty face up.
Thoughts?