You'll be over that posting limit in no time. No worries.
My main criticism is that this thread was originally about adding garbage hands to your raising range and premium hands to your limping range in an effort to polarize them and confuse the people at the table. I would argue that both of those are money losing choices. If you aren't raising your premium hands, you are leaving value on the table against the weak players. If you are adding weak hands to your playing ranges, you are likely going to make your overall range too weak. It is hard to hit a flop in hold'em, even playing good cards. There will be plenty of "nothing" in your range after the flop, even if you stick to opening good cards.
There will be situations where the cards literally don't matter. I would still argue that raising is how you would play those spots, and not calling. If you are first in the pot, you might as well raise and try to win it right there or increase your chances of winning it on the flop. If you are not the first in the pot, say two people limped in front of you, then this isn't a situation where you are likely to easily steal with any two cards. You can safely let your junk go, and limp behind with hands that do well in multi-way deep SPR spots (connected hands, suited aces, small/medium pairs, etc.). I would still raise my premium hands to build a bigger pot that I am likely to win at showdown or when everyone misses and gives up.
I vary my game, but I don't think I have an open-limping range in hold'em for any of them. I have some "limp behind" and "call behind" hands, but I don't limp first in. The problem with limping behind 9-2, or other bottom 20% hands, is that your profit (if any) from that hand is mostly going to be from stealing. It is a lot harder to steal when you are in a multiway pot and don't have the initiative.
There's a great book on this sort of thing "Small Stakes No-Limit Hold'em" by Ed Miller. He talks extensively on taking hands that have little showdown value, but often have good stealing value in the right spots. I'll quote some of it.
In many cases, however, the two equities
combined are still not enough to make the hand profitable. For
example, say you have 7♦2♠ under the gun. You have showdown
equity and steal equity. After all, you can flop a full house, or you can
raise and win the blinds. However, due to your weak hand and poor
position, usually these equities will be relatively small—too small to
justify risking money to take advantage of them.
* All hands have two kinds of equity: showdown equity and steal equity.
* When the combined equity is worth more than what you have to risk to play on, the situation is profitable.
* When the combined equity is too small to justify the risk, fold.
|
|
Here's a relevant quote:
Few hands can be played solely to make the best hand. One
common error many players make is that they focus too narrowly on
showdown equity with hands like suited connectors, small suited aces,
and other speculative hands. With these hands they try to see a cheap
flop and hope to catch a monster. If they miss, they usually don’t
bother trying to steal. They just fold. Unfortunately, these speculative
hands don’t connect with the board often enough to have good
showdown equity. Unless your opponents are exceptionally loose,
these hands rely on steal equity to be profitable. If you won’t
frequently make money from stealing, your default play should be to
fold them.
|
|
If you're going to play those hands, profitably, you are going to want to have at least some steal equity. Also note, he isn't even talking about the pure trash hands, which require even higher dedication to steal. Your game plan should be around stealing with those hands, and that starts pre-flop with raising them. You probably won't be able to steal every time. Sometimes you will just give up. But, your default plan should be to steal.
If your opponents are just going to see the river most of the time, as happens in live games, tighten up and just play your value hands. Your steal equity is too close to zero for junk hands to show a profit.
Edit: If we ever did sit at a table, you'd probably not mistake me for the tightest player there, even though it might seem so from this post. I generally play a fairly loose game, especially from the Highjack, CO, and Button. I also have little problem moving my stack around when I feel like the spot is right.