Multi-Level Thinking: Experience needed

L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
  • Level 0: I know nothing
  • Level 1: What do I have?
  • Level 2: What does my opponent have?
  • Level 3: What does my opponent think I have?
  • Level 4: What does my opponent think that I think they have?
  • Level 5: What does my opponent think that I think they think I have?

    From your successful experience at ALL stakes that your familiar with, when playing cash games, what level of thinking do players use at different stakes? For example:

    Freerolls: Level 0
    0.01/0.02: Level 0
    0.02/0.05 Level 0-1
    0.1/0.25 Level 1-2
    0.5/$1 Level 2
    $1/$2 Level 2
    $10/$20 Level 3


    I'm not saying these are correct. Actually, I'm clueless and that's the purpose of the thread. I'm really trying to understand what to expect at the different stakes so that I can read the right books and observe different tables, at different stakes, to get a better feel for things before I jump in the pool . I have all of Sklansky's stuff, but I obviously won't be reading the advanced stuff if I'm playing at the micro stakes because you can (and I assume you should) only play 1 level above your opponents . Experience is the best teacher, but I don't see why we shouldn't brace ourselves if it's an option.

    So, for the sake of myself or anyone else who stumbles upon the thread, please don't respond if your only speculating and think your using common sense to answer the question (obviously your welcome to post in the thread). If you can't resist, please let us all know your only speculating, otherwise lets let the successful grinders and future pros help us out with the stakes they're familiar with if they're up for it :cool:.
 
Last edited:
T

treesandsuch

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Total posts
10
Chips
0
The level of thinking people I play with is "do I feel lucky?". Not sure what level that is but all I know is it's good for making me money :):):) I play mostly $20 buy-in home games.
 
C

Crudelis

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
You put the level of thinking at the $10/$20 level at level 3? At $10/$20 it is beyond level 5 thinking.
 
L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
You put the level of thinking at the $10/$20 level at level 3? At $10/$20 it is beyond level 5 thinking.

...I'm not saying these are correct. Actually, I'm clueless and that's the purpose of the thread. I'm really trying to understand...

I wonder what your level is lol.


The level of thinking people I play with is "do I feel lucky?". Not sure what level that is but all I know is it's good for making me money :):):) I play mostly $20 buy-in home games.

Whatever works! Sounds like level 1...maybe 1.5. Your in transition.
 
Last edited:
C

Crudelis

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
I read your entire post and understood it perfectly. You did say that they weren't correct but you could have at least made them a little more accurate. Allow me to enlighten you.

The levels you stated in your post doesn't even cover most of the things you should think about when your playing. It should look more like this...

Level 0: ALL IN!!! I hope I win. :)
Level 1: What do I have?
Level 2: What do I have? + What position am I in?
Level 3: What do I have? + What position am I in? + What I think my opponent has?
Level 4: What do I have? + What position am I in? + What I think my opponent has? + Do I have odds to call?


Just because you are playing micro stakes doesn't mean that you should only be thinking 1 level above your opponent. The higher your level of thinking the more of an advantage you will have against others. This is not always the case though. For example if you want to steal the pot and your opponent is a fish that doesn't even know what pot odds are then the size of the raise doesn't matter, in that case you would determine if you want to bluff by how he has played other hands. If the opponent calls every bet and every raise and if you are considering a bluff then obviously the bluff is a bad idea because he is a calling station, on the other hand if the opponent is too tight then you can min raise as a bluff to take the pot down because in that case it would be the right move.
 
Last edited:
L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
That should've been your first post then. Still its redundant 'cause we can go on and on about what exactly makes up level 2 or level 3, etc and thats not what the post is about. I think I got my point across with what I'm looking for in my OP.

Also, you'll just get yourself in trouble if you play more than 1 level above your opponent. Every situation is different as you stated to cover yourself, but in the end you shouldn't ever make sophisticated moves on unsophisticated players or even consider it. If your thinking 2 levels above anyone then I consider that to be sophisticated play with a less sophisticated player. It's like trying to bluff an idiot. Don't and KISS. way I see it.
 
C

Crudelis

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
That should've been your first post then. Still its redundant 'cause we can go on and on about what exactly makes up level 2 or level 3, etc and thats not what the post is about. I think I got my point across with what I'm looking for in my OP.

Also, you'll just get yourself in trouble if you play more than 1 level above your opponent. Every situation is different as you stated to cover yourself, but in the end you shouldn't ever make sophisticated moves on unsophisticated players or even consider it. If your thinking 2 levels above anyone then I consider that to be sophisticated play with a less sophisticated player. It's like trying to bluff an idiot. Don't and KISS. way I see it.

I agree with you somewhat. Perhaps I should have been more specific; when you are faced with a decision it is OK to use a much higher level of thinking to make your decision, but in situations where you are putting your opponent in a position to make a decision then you should be thinking at only one level above him. (Situations such as a bet or raise leaves the decision up to the opponent.)
 
M

marknz88

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Total posts
178
Chips
0
I play 2nl/5nl and attempt to think at levels 3-4. So far I'm not a consistent winning player by doing this.

I believe there are quiet a few people at the micros that think like this, yet because its such a lottery, end up losing more than they win?
 
T

The_Pup

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Total posts
254
Chips
0
I fiddle about at the .05/.1 & .1/.25 online where level 3 thinking seems plenty to beat most players. In home games I play with real money ;-) (£ 1/2) where level 3 and 4 are usually good enough. Online tourneys can be a different kettle of fish. I often play at $5-20 buy in where the level of opponents can be as low as -1 (especially at the beginning) to levels 4 and 5 as we get deeper. Incidentally, this is the appeal of tourneys for me - to have to think at a decent level.
 
Stu_Ungar

Stu_Ungar

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 14, 2008
Total posts
6,236
Chips
0
I agree with you somewhat. Perhaps I should have been more specific; when you are faced with a decision it is OK to use a much higher level of thinking to make your decision, but in situations where you are putting your opponent in a position to make a decision then you should be thinking at only one level above him. (Situations such as a bet or raise leaves the decision up to the opponent.)

NO

You cannot think at a significantly higher level than your opponent.

If your opponent is not thinking what your range is then how can you think at a significantly higher level where you question how his perception of your range alters his play. He isnt thinking about your range. So you cannot think at that level.

At best you can think one level above your opponent.
 
jjbish

jjbish

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Total posts
83
Chips
0
NO

You cannot think at a significantly higher level than your opponent.

If your opponent is not thinking what your range is then how can you think at a significantly higher level where you question how his perception of your range alters his play. He isnt thinking about your range. So you cannot think at that level.

At best you can think one level above your opponent.

/thread.

this is all you need to remeber usually. I think even up to 400nl you needn't get into leveling wars. I've seen several times where over thinking has cost peeps lots of money.
 
NineLions

NineLions

Advanced beginner
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Total posts
4,979
Chips
0
The levels you stated in your post doesn't even cover most of the things you should think about when your playing. It should look more like this...

Level 0: ALL IN!!! I hope I win. :)
Level 1: What do I have?
Level 2: What do I have? + What position am I in?
Level 3: What do I have? + What position am I in? + What I think my opponent has?
Level 4: What do I have? + What position am I in? + What I think my opponent has? + Do I have odds to call?


Just because you are playing micro stakes doesn't mean that you should only be thinking 1 level above your opponent.

The thread starter is referring to the standard definition of "levels of thinking" which I think he's defined correctly. You can make up your own idea of "levels", but that's different than the standard definition.

NO

You cannot think at a significantly higher level than your opponent.

If your opponent is not thinking what your range is then how can you think at a significantly higher level where you question how his perception of your range alters his play. He isnt thinking about your range. So you cannot think at that level.

At best you can think one level above your opponent.

And Stu is making the correct statement, again for the standard definition of "levels of thinking".

It doesn't mean that what you've listed is invalid, but don't try to change a pre-existing definition.


And like c9 says, don't worry about it. You need thinking/attentive opponents before you can even consider level 3.
 
J

JEP712

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Total posts
538
Chips
0
Level -1: Suited and they almost connect!............should I?.........Yeah..........ALL IN!
 
L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
Alright, so it sounds like I was over thinking or getting a bit ahead of myself and there's actually a long road ahead before I need to dive into this. I'll probably know when the time comes. Thanks all.
 
IveGot0uts

IveGot0uts

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Total posts
444
Chips
0
Yeah, the only way to learn poker is by playing. You can arm yourself with a lot of good information from books, but you have to get into the game and feel your way around before you can really start to know how to play. If you're starting at the micros just know that 5nl and 2nl your oppoenents are level 1 all the way unless you force them into level 2 by making them feel uncomfortable, and even then half the time they're not capable. Thats not to say there aren't plenty of 0ish players out there, but you'll know who they are pretty readily. I skipped over 10NL pretty much, opting to take advantage of the edge of being deep stacked at 5nl instead for my 10 dollar buy in period of BRM (started with 50 bucks a bit over a year ago). At 25NL I think you start to see levels 3 and 4 start making their appearance, but you still have plenty of 1 and 2 kicking around. It seems through these levels the players try their damndest to stick to level 1, and sometimes 2 unless your force them to up their game, as always certain regs will be exceptions.

Generally in the micros they're a clown unless they give you reason to believe otherwise, and even then its often situational. You can even drive some silly 0 up to a 3 or so if you piss him off by flaming him in chat and running trappy lines on him too aggressively.
 
L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
Yeah, the only way to learn poker is by playing... you have to get into the game and feel your way around before you can really start to know how to play... at the micros just know that 5nl and 2nl your oppoenents are level 1 all the way unless you force them into level 2...and even then half the time they're not capable...regs will be exceptions...You can even drive some silly 0 up to a 3 or so if you piss him off by...running trappy lines on him too aggressively.

Music to my ears :D. Congrats on building your BR and your play at .25NL. It seems you should grind there exclusively for awhile. Thats my goal anyway.
 
BLieve

BLieve

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Total posts
224
Chips
0
I believe decisions are based on more than what you think your opponent has or what he thinks you have. Position, ranges, stack and bet size, outs all come into play.
 
Mase31683

Mase31683

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Total posts
1,474
Awards
1
Chips
1
All stakes $10nl and lower the average player is going to be a level 1 thinker.

It seems the average player at $25nl is more level 2.

The players who are most likely to be at the average level of thinking or worse, are those who's stats generally reflect little work on playing a solid game. They will have a large gap between their VPIP/PFR, they will be on the passive side.

The players more likely to be above the average level of thinking are those that are aggressive, that have solid stats like 18/15. LAG's in particular are generally +level thinkers because they have to take into consideration how their constant betting is affecting the other player's decisions against them, so they are basically forced to be a multiple level thinker.
 
Kasanova King

Kasanova King

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Total posts
798
Chips
0
Personally, primarily on Full Tilt (On bodog & UB 80 - 90% of the players in micros are level 1-2 or less) I would say that about 25 - 50% of the players are level 2 thinkers at .02/.05 - .05/.1 levels. Depending on the table - usually 6 max - you may find 1-2 level 3 thinkers (but they usually don't even know they're level 3 thinkers, lol)
 
Top