Limit or No Limit

B

Boltpoker

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Total posts
95
Chips
0
Hello, I was just looking for people's opinions on what they like better, No-limit hold em or Limit Hold emand just some thought on them. I have been playing a lot of limit holdem lately and it seems to be a better fit for me. I talk about it on my blog
http://boltpoker.blogspot.com and I was just looking for some feedback and opinions. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T

THGE

Enthusiast
Platinum Level
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Total posts
68
Chips
0
NL or L

I preffer No Limit because the emotion and tension are hight, but I play better limit hold'em, maybe sometimes I am very agressive and lost some hands.
 
mfturq

mfturq

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Total posts
102
Chips
0
I prefer no limit and envy those with the discipline to play limit well
 
M

munkie

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Total posts
13
Chips
0
No limit is much better than limit cuz it requires actual skill. Whether it be mathematical calculations or reading people. Limit is a crap game cuz 9 times outta 10, no matter what the tard you're against has, he will call the minimum bet cuz that's all you can bet. You could have that retard dominated, like down to 1 out after the flop, and since you can't push him off that 1 outer, cuz he is a retard, he will hit on the river. Retards will thrive at limit cuz you can't go completely broke on one hand, as they very well should for being idiots.
 
One9Design

One9Design

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Total posts
45
Chips
0
I prefer No Limit because you have a greater ability to influence your opponents pot odds. If you simply raise enough to where it does not make mathematical sense for your opponent to raise you can increase your long term winnings. Harrington talks about this in Harrington on Hold 'em, Vol 1.
 
B

Boltpoker

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Total posts
95
Chips
0
I do like both forms, I am just switching between the two and trying different strategies. I do agree that limit is full of donks that call no matter what.
 
I

Ioreojr

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Total posts
53
Chips
0
when i play holdem in the casino, i like to play 3/6 limit.. i can stay up there for a few hours, get to know the table and usually come out a few hundred ahead.. but online i prefer playing NL... i get to see a lot of hands, and i have time to be patient and wait for a good starting hand...
 
R

Ranger390

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Total posts
217
Chips
0
I have been playing Limit, both online and in my local casino, for the last year. I also mixed in a few No Limit tournaments. Recently, I did well playing No Limit cash games on a weekend trip to another casino, where nobody plays Limit. Based on these experiences, it seems to me that Limit is much more of a science than No Limit. With Limit, selecting starting hands, calculating outs and pot odds are the most important basic skills. On the other hand, No Limit is much more of an art than a science. Sure, all the basic skills are necessary, but reading opponents and putting opponents on hands become much more important, as do implied odds. Becoming a good No Limit player requires mastering more of the intangibles.
 
Velutha

Velutha

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Total posts
669
Chips
0
I am no good at limit. I can't handle the marginal hands drawing with relatively easy decisions to make on all three streets. The ability to shove is half the fun of poker imo.
 
silverslugger33

silverslugger33

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
451
Chips
0
I like NL better. It lets me do more with pot odds and such.
 
mfturq

mfturq

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Total posts
102
Chips
0
No limit is much better than limit cuz it requires actual skill. Whether it be mathematical calculations or reading people. Limit is a crap game cuz 9 times outta 10, no matter what the tard you're against has, he will call the minimum bet cuz that's all you can bet. You could have that retard dominated, like down to 1 out after the flop, and since you can't push him off that 1 outer, cuz he is a retard, he will hit on the river. Retards will thrive at limit cuz you can't go completely broke on one hand, as they very well should for being idiots.

So one outers have a better chance in limit? I am confused...I would love to play opponents not willing to be pushed off of one outers
 
liv3player

liv3player

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Total posts
136
Chips
0
Both

I actually like both.In limit you can call down hands you normally couldn't in no-limit and often win these hands.In no-limit the over pair to the board or big pp preflop allins can crush you something fierce(I know).I still say play your cards and the rest will fall into place.
 
M

murph13

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
for me, i think that limit is better to start playing poker with....granted you have less influence on a person, but when you're just learning, it's better that you play limit and cut your losses, rather than go all in on a hand without thinking of all the other outs. As you play longer, you start to see the other options which will make you better at no limit. Also, because you have been forced to hold yourself at certain limits, you aren't as tempted to go all in on a crap hand that has a lower probability of winning...but that's my view on it
 
M

munkie

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Total posts
13
Chips
0
So one outers have a better chance in limit? I am confused...I would love to play opponents not willing to be pushed off of one outers
I'm just saying limit lets people who have no business even playing have a chance to win. Cuz unless the limits are really high, noone can go broke from any single hand if they just cold call till they hit their 10/1 hand.
 
M

murph13

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
I'm just saying limit lets people who have no business even playing have a chance to win. Cuz unless the limits are really high, noone can go broke from any single hand if they just cold call till they hit their 10/1 hand.

but thats the way it is with any idiotic player. if they got one out in no limit, they'll still push for it...as far as i can tell anyways
 
B

Brian182

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Total posts
117
Chips
0
I prefer no limit and envy those with the discipline to play limit well

lol, i'm with this guy. I can't stand limit, and I really don't know how to play it properly. they're totally different beasts!
 
M

murph13

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
it's just that you gotta know that your top pair or low end straight might not cut it....it basically makes you read and control yourself more.
 
T

tisias

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Total posts
61
Chips
0
No limit as well. It is rather annoying loosing from a lucky player at the river...:). Even if the lucky one is me! :D
 
imasquare

imasquare

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Total posts
191
Chips
0
i prefer limit cash games, because i am a chicken that does not like risking loosing everything on luck, but i play no limit mtt and sngs.
 
B

bobboss171

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Total posts
92
Chips
0
I prefer holden no limit because is more fast , more emoticion ,
more agressive , but i played both.
 
C

chigal

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Total posts
37
Chips
0
I do poorly at limit and seem to piss my chips away really quickly being the donk calling station rather than being careful about what hands I get involved in as with NL. Also harder to push people off a hand in limit as others have stated.

I imagine as I get more experience I may come to enjoy limit more. And other games besides hold em too, lol.
 
Divebitch

Divebitch

Miss you, Buckster,,,,,
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Total posts
3,130
Awards
1
Chips
1
No limit is much better than limit cuz it requires actual skill. Whether it be mathematical calculations or reading people. Limit is a crap game cuz 9 times outta 10, no matter what the tard you're against has, he will call the minimum bet cuz that's all you can bet. You could have that retard dominated, like down to 1 out after the flop, and since you can't push him off that 1 outer, cuz he is a retard, he will hit on the river. Retards will thrive at limit cuz you can't go completely broke on one hand, as they very well should for being idiots.

I'm just saying limit lets people who have no business even playing have a chance to win. Cuz unless the limits are really high, noone can go broke from any single hand if they just cold call till they hit their 10/1 hand.

Here's a better way to look at it, IMNSVHO :p ... If said retard is calling for his one outer or 10/1 shot, sure, he will donk it out every 1 out of 10 times. He is sadly complacent and misled by the fact that, as you say, he will not go broke on any one hand. But eventually, he will look down at his stack after those 10 hands wondering where half his chips went.

The beauty of limit is that many small mistakes by calling stations will, in the longrun, add up for your benefit. Think of it this way, if you had bet 4x or all-in, all the 'folds' are money you won't see.

Limit is much more of a science than No Limit. With Limit, selecting starting hands, calculating outs and pot odds are the most important basic skills. On the other hand, No Limit is much more of an art than a science. Sure, all the basic skills are necessary, but reading opponents and putting opponents on hands become much more important, as do implied odds. Becoming a good No Limit player requires mastering more of the intangibles.

Have to agree with all of this. I'd only add that while opponents are more difficult to read in limit, it's still important, and you'll get far more opportunities to do so, as you'll see a lot more showdowns while it's cheap to do so. And to continue on the 'longrun' idea, munkie, they're simply 2 different games, requiring different mindsets going in. Just as you're not going to make them fold, they cannot make you fold when the situation is reversed. Since it's harder to pull people off their hands, you cannot make many stupid mistakes. With limit you are not simply calculating your own outs and pot odds, but the same for your opponents to call should a flush and/or str8 draw flop to threaten your trips.
 
chukky88

chukky88

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Total posts
104
Chips
0
absolutly no limit. limit is too boring...in no limit you can win more money(or lose more) but is much fun and tenision is more higher
 
srt27300

srt27300

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Total posts
53
Chips
0
I, like some of you, prefer NoLimit HE, but play better on Limit HE.
The stress, the stack management are more interesting in No Limit as it is the success key ...
For comparison, the stack management is more basic in Limit HE ...

I think it is better for beginning poker cash games to start with Limit ... It makes you being more prudent ... and that becomes better to play no limit as it allows you to manage, bulff, etc. ==> And in the case you lost some money, you have more chance to have it back quickly playing on NoLimit :)
 
W

WolfShadow

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 2, 2008
Total posts
118
Chips
0
I prefer no limit anything, i seem to notice even more people playin any2 cards in limit and its makes it harder to read em
 
Top