Can LAGs make more money?

C

ClubArrow77

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Total posts
317
Chips
0
While playing for a while at 2nl and reviewing my hands, I see that I may not be getting as much value as I should with my premium hands, often because my raises are folded to and rarely called. When called and I get bet into with a low flop with no pairs, I also fold which loses value and I fold my hands unless I get a premium hand. Now this is a good basic strategy that has won me money but I do see that LAGs seem to make more money as their stacks always seem to get bigger while mine shrinks. Sure, this could just be me focusing on lucky LAGs and I have seen LAGs lose their massive stack with stupid plays but I find that their hands get more action than mine, possibly because I nit up much more than they do.

My VP$IP is probably around 20% since I throw away sc and marginal hands like KT, KQ, KJ, QJ, QT, or JTs when out of position or if there is a reraise in front of me. Maybe I my opponents never get a hand when I do but when I raise, I do see people simply fold to my raise and I only win the blinds w/ AQo. I was wondering if I should incorporate more hands and widen my range or should I just grind it out and not widen my range until higher stakes? If so, at what levels?
 
KoRnholio

KoRnholio

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Total posts
906
Chips
0
Good LAGs make a lot more. Bad LAGs will usually end up giving it back.

It's a fine line, but generally the good LAGs only play loose/fast for small bets and on the earlier streets. In big pots and on the turn/river they play much more TAG. The bad LAGs continue to play too loose in big pots.

Good LAGs make more money off their big hands. Especially against opponents who don't realize that these LAG players will "have it" when all the money goes in.
 
F4STFORW4RD

F4STFORW4RD

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 5, 2011
Total posts
767
Chips
0
TAG is safer and easier when you are starting out, LAG requires better post-flop skills and the ability to lay hands down.
 
R

RVladimiro

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Total posts
759
Chips
0
Don't confuse LAGs with maniacs. I'm pretty sure there are no LAGs at 2NL.
 
B

BlueNowhere

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Total posts
4,234
Chips
0
I occasionally switch my play up and try to play, opening with about 50% of hands but you really do find yourself in some tricky spots post-flop and whilst you do win a lot of pots its so hard not to lose a big pot and hand all your profits back.
 
F4STFORW4RD

F4STFORW4RD

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 5, 2011
Total posts
767
Chips
0
Don't confuse LAGs with maniacs. I'm pretty sure there are no LAGs at 2NL.
*Split* said:
There are tremendous differences between TAG and LAG players, but the common misconceptions of LAG players are what make it, in my opinion, the most profitable style in today's micro games.
He then goes on to say roughly what Kornholio said in his earlier post.
 
KoRnholio

KoRnholio

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Total posts
906
Chips
0
As an example:

Hero raises, gets 3bet by a player, who then shows down 97 suited. Hero labels this player as a maniac.

A few orbits later Hero raises preflop with JJ. "Maniac" reraises. Hero 4bets. "Maniac" tanks, then shoves. Hero often makes a hero call here, only to be shown QQ+/AK. He curses his luck, reloads and players even looser trying to "out maniac the maniac".
 
R

RVladimiro

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Total posts
759
Chips
0
He then goes on to say roughly what Kornholio said in his earlier post.

Sorry, my bad for not quoting but I was refering to the OP and the fact that 2NL was the stake in question. KoRnholio is spot on obviously. Actually I understood the difference watching SS videos. :)
 
Logan2

Logan2

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Total posts
4,054
Chips
0
my raises are folded to and rarely called. When called and I get bet into with a low flop with no pairs,

My VP$IP is probably around 20% since I throw away sc and marginal hands like KT, KQ, KJ, QJ, QT, or JTs when out of position or if there is a reraise in front of me. I was wondering if I should incorporate more hands and widen my range or should I just grind it out and not widen my range until higher stakes? If so, at what levels?
20% is not nit, but you say "probably", so you don´t really know?. Also Vpip is less important when people is folding (unless you play like <10%), you need to see your PFR, if your vpip is really 20% but you raise only 5% of course people fold every time you raise, if you are 10/8 sure they will fold most of the time.

But unless you actually know your numbers not sure how wide you could make the change?.

If you are talking about 6 max then forget i post.
 
B

BlueNowhere

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Total posts
4,234
Chips
0
As an example:

Hero raises, gets 3bet by a player, who then shows down 97 suited. Hero labels this player as a maniac.

A few orbits later Hero raises preflop with JJ. "Maniac" reraises. Hero 4bets. "Maniac" tanks, then shoves. Hero often makes a hero call here, only to be shown QQ+/AK. He curses his luck, reloads and players even looser trying to "out maniac the maniac".

Nothing beats trying to out manic a maniac though
 
Logan2

Logan2

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Total posts
4,054
Chips
0
Don't confuse LAGs with maniacs. I'm pretty sure there are no LAGs at 2NL.
If by maniacs mean 35/30 or higher and with lag mean 20/18 to 28/26 then i disagree, there is abunch of both in 2nl.
 
acky100

acky100

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Total posts
3,523
Chips
0
OP, if you're struggling to get value at 2nl, it is definitely not because you're not playing LAG, i guess a lag style works best where people fold when they get scared, and generally people dont like folding a lot at 2nl. Definitely dont switch to being a lag if you're not crushing 2nl as a tight player, it really isn't neccesary and will just get you into too many tough spots for now. I havent came across 1 good lag at 25nl yet in like 50k hands, is there a level where good lags come into play a lot more often? like 100? 200nl?
 
R

RVladimiro

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Total posts
759
Chips
0
If by maniacs mean 35/30 or higher and with lag mean 20/18 to 28/26 then i disagree, there is a bunch of both in 2nl.

I think it's quite difficult to id a LAG by their VPIP/PFR but skill wise... I seriously doubt there's a bunch of them. As I see it and this is my personal opinion, in 2NL we are all wanabes. TAG wanabes, LAG wanabes, nits that wanabe proper grinding nits.

How many excelent players are there in 2NL? Maybe I'm either too negative about 2NL or too romantic about what a TAG or a LAG is but I don't think we (yeah I'm part of the fish :D) have the skill to be either of those.
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
When your skill increases (when you can accurately put people on ranges and get away with thinner valuebets and know when to bet-fold good hands), you can play a wider range of hands profitably. This increases your profits on already profitable hands because people give you less credit for a hand when you actually have one.

That doesn't mean it's all profit profit profit; you do run into more marginal spots and tough decisions and it increases your variance by simply playing more big pots with hands that have good equity but aren't likely to be ahead.

There's a lot more to being a successful player than just being aggressive, although TBH blind aggression will probably work at a lot of 2 NL tables if you can back down when someone shows up with the nuts. Trying to mimic Tom Dwan 3-betting 32o and triple barreling air out of position isn't going to get you very far if you don't understand why he does it or when. Dwan himself is actually probably closer to GTO (game-theory optimal) than any other high-stakes player in the world outside of the true HU specialists.
 
Nathan Williams

Nathan Williams

Poker Pro
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Total posts
1,095
Awards
3
Chips
10
I don't really know what the exact stats for a "LAG" player are but when I play 4 tables or less of full ring, which happens very rarely, only when making a video, I pretty much always have 6max stats, like 22/19. And I seem to kill it every time. I think if you already have a decent edge over the game then adding some more hands will only help your winrate.

But if we are talking about actual profit or money made I think the TAG approach is better. TAG's can play more tables and thus more hands and more rakeback. I don't think the higher winrate of a LAG player is enough to make up for this.
 
C

ClubArrow77

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Total posts
317
Chips
0
When your skill increases (when you can accurately put people on ranges and get away with thinner valuebets and know when to bet-fold good hands), you can play a wider range of hands profitably. This increases your profits on already profitable hands because people give you less credit for a hand when you actually have one.

That doesn't mean it's all profit profit profit; you do run into more marginal spots and tough decisions and it increases your variance by simply playing more big pots with hands that have good equity but aren't likely to be ahead.

There's a lot more to being a successful player than just being aggressive, although TBH blind aggression will probably work at a lot of 2 NL tables if you can back down when someone shows up with the nuts. Trying to mimic Tom Dwan 3-betting 32o and triple barreling air out of position isn't going to get you very far if you don't understand why he does it or when. Dwan himself is actually probably closer to GTO (game-theory optimal) than any other high-stakes player in the world outside of the true HU specialists.

My VP$IP is 20.92 and my PRF is 15.8 in 2nl FR. I dont go into pots with marginal hands like 32s or even 68s and rarely play sc unless in late position. The hands I play I pretty much always raise unless im in BB and it is limp/folded to me. I feel though that since I only play premium hands (77+, AT+, KQ, KJ and KT late only, 78s and 89s only if I feel like it). I might be losing value and not maximize value from not playing more sc or cards like QTs except in late position.
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
Math doesn't seem to add up. Let's say you can either play 45 hands per hour at 4 tables = 180 hands or play 6 tables of 30 hands per hour = 180 hands?

I realize there's rakeback but you're also getting more hands in with fewer tables which leads to better reads.
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
BTW if your style works for you, obviously go with it. No reason to mess with success especially at low stakes.
 
C

ClubArrow77

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Total posts
317
Chips
0
I guess I shouldnt be complaining too much since I am winning at 2nl although I dont know if im just on a heater or if im playing well. I really dont get the chance to stack someone unless that person is a complete fish that shoves all in with 2nd pair weak kicker and I have top pair or if I suck out on them by the river. I just sounds like reading from other threads on this site that good players have no problems stacking others and often stack one or two people at least per table before leaving.
 
ben_rhyno

ben_rhyno

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Total posts
1,642
Chips
0
Sounds like you need to work on your betsizing too if you're not stacking other people, building pots with the best hand and valuebetting.
 
C

ClubArrow77

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Total posts
317
Chips
0
I bet my premiums about 4xBB or 5xBB and bet around 3/4 to pot. Should I overbet the pot?
 
ben_rhyno

ben_rhyno

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Total posts
1,642
Chips
0
If you are 100bb's deep:
open for 5BB, 1 caller not from blinds and pot = 11.5BB's
Cbet flop for 9bb's and called, pot = 29.5bb's
Bet turn for 25bb's if you think you are still good, get called, pot = 79.5bb's
River we have 61bb's left to bet into a pot of 79.5bb's meaning you can comfortably bet this and not look suspicious
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
In single-raised, HU pots it's going to be hard to get stacks in most times - you usually have to have a reraise on some street. I wouldn't worry about this, overbetting is usually going to be bad. It certainly has its uses in a lot of spots but for the most part, concentrate on extracting value from someone's entire range, not on getting their whole stack every hand.
 
M

McAlonso

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Total posts
10
Chips
0
LAGs>TAgs, thats why you wont find a lot os LAG regs in micro...
 
jbbb

jbbb

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Total posts
1,384
Chips
0
You make most money playing the opposite type. Therefore when most people play tight and aggressive, the people who loosen up to exploit this tightness are going to make most money. If everyone played loose passive, TAGs would make the most money, hence the reason playing TAG is sought after in micro's poker (most profitable against fish).
 
Real Money Poker - Real Money Casinos
Top