Originally Posted by RythmAndBlues
What the hell are you talking about ?
Prob should of expanded on my OP but i will now.
Basically i see tread after tread regarding questions were you give little if no info on villains, thus impossible to give a 'correct' answer.e.g In this case, a number of answers may be correct, fold,call,4-bet, its player dependent,your image at the table, etc.
Post treads where its obv you could not of got away from, 'cold deck', and look for 'pity', in the cash hand analysis section?
Ask ABC questions about spots at a level where you should at this stage (nl25) have more or less 'perfected', which leads me to believe that you jumped straight into this level.? Where you might not be profitable in, which is never a good idea.Not telling you what to do with your money or anything,just saying..
When people do reply and give valuable info about a specific situation, you seem to already have a perceived image of what was the right play (reminds me of myself at times), making replies to your future treads pointless imo.
I dont intend to come across as an arrogant so and so, as im not, but in future when posting hands id recommend to give as much info on your villians, notes, tendecies, your image at the table etc as your feedback will be a lot more accurate, which in turn will lead you to make better decisions going forward.
From the 220 hands that ive played with you, you seem to be too passive which leads to harder decisions post flop, you dont c-bet enough and you need to defend your BB a lot more, also have a look at some 'starting hands charts', as your playing some marginal hands, albeit in pos but is a leak imo.