I limp from SB

C

ChurchSkiz

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Total posts
138
Awards
1
Chips
0
Saw this quote from Stu Ungar:

XX calls a very high % from the SB with pots that have limpers and plays very fit or fold post flop.

It has been pointed out that this is incorrect play, but he will argue the toss for days on end.

I do this....a lot, with any marginal or even sub-marginal hand. If there are two limpers I will call with a huge range because I am getting 6:1 odds on my call. With 3 limpers or more I will call with any 2 cards including 2-7.

Can someone explain why this is incorrect?
 
Debi

Debi

Forum Admin
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Total posts
74,641
Awards
20
Chips
1,331
Well - I am no genius but you are going to be the first to act every time. That is not a great position to be in with any 2 cards. I like what Tommay Angelo says to people who think they are getting a half price special in the sb.

"Why pay half price for something you don't want for free?"
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
With 3 limpers or more I will call with any 2 cards including 2-7.
Odds of flopping two pair or better with 27o is about 1 out of 50. Any other hand is going to be very difficult to play. And when you flop 2 pair, you will be using two cards on the flop yourself, so it will be hard for your opponents to have much. And as dakota pointed out, you'll be acting first so it will be hard to build a big pot.

Sure, you're getting like 9:1 with 3 limpers, but that's nowhere near enough odds to make 72o a profitable hand limping from the small blind in a no-limit game.
 
BelgoSuisse

BelgoSuisse

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Total posts
9,218
Chips
0
+1 at what c9 says.

Raising 72o in this situation, on the other hand, is über sexy. :D
 
M

massimo

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Total posts
192
Chips
0
Here is how I look at it: If you were on the button getting 6:1, would you want to limp with 27?

If you say no to limping on the button, then you wouldn't want to limp from the sb either.
 
C

ChurchSkiz

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Total posts
138
Awards
1
Chips
0
Well I learned something about my ignorance. For whatever reason I thought it was 8:1 to hit two pair. I will stop doing this now, thanks.
 
BelgoSuisse

BelgoSuisse

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Total posts
9,218
Chips
0
Here is how I look at it: If you were on the button getting 6:1, would you want to limp with 27?

obviously not, but raising would be sexy... :D

did i mention i love raising?
 
pedroman7

pedroman7

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Total posts
352
Chips
0
I think playing hand like 22-88 or 45s+ are ok to limp in the sb but what are you hoping for with 72o. If the comes Js 7s 2h are you going to like it that much in a 5 or 6 way pot. Most people will play cautiously in muli-way pots and you won't get them to put a lot of money in with one pair. I think you stand to lose a big pot or win a small one more often than not with trash hands. Yeah you are getting great odds to call but the reverse implied odds here makes for an easy fold imo.
 
SavagePenguin

SavagePenguin

Put the win in penguin
Bronze Level
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Total posts
7,594
Awards
1
Chips
3
Well I learned something about my ignorance. For whatever reason I thought it was 8:1 to hit two pair. I will stop doing this now, thanks.

The odds of your PP flopping a set are about 8:1. Maybe you confused it with that?

From the SB I'll limp with stuff like small pairs hoping to hit a set. Otherwise, feh! It's too difficult to play hands post flop out-of-position. And even if your little hand makes two pair, that's easily counterfeited when the board pairs.
 
Stu_Ungar

Stu_Ungar

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 14, 2008
Total posts
6,236
Chips
0
Well the following advice was given to XX and resulted in him accusing me of harassing him.

The basic jist is that you cannot enter pots solely hoping to flop big. You need a backup plan of stealing post flop if you miss (as you will miss most of the time)

Well the way I would look at it is this..

By completing the SB with a weak range in MW pots, you are forcing yourself to play very fit or fold post flop.

Lets assume a final preflpp pot with 4 players (A middle position limper, the button, YOU THE SB and the BB completes).

The pot is 4bb

You are now OOP and low and behold you miss the flop because most of the time you will (just like any flop really!)

Now you look to steal.

Well a c-bet of 1/2 pot is 2bb (woow thats a hell of a raise!! 2bb isnt really the kind of powerhouse raise thats going to blow these fish of their hands. Fish limp preflop and low and behold they peel postflop too).

so lets asume these guys fold a lot.. they each fold 65% of the time (which for a guy who peels.. thats a relitively high fold %

The combined fold to c-bet of 3 loose fish limpers should be around.

0.65^3=0.274625

so the combined FTs post flop of all 3 players is 27%

Now we are putting 2bb into a 4bb pot as a steal so it has to be successfull 2/(2+4)=0.333333 % of the time.

It isnt!

it succeeds only 27% of the time.

So by competing the SB with a weak range you are leaving yourself OOP with a hand thats unlikely to be strong postflop AND you have little chance of stealing.

So you arent adding to your winrate by doing this, instead you are losing more. The few times you make a decent hand are whats pushing your WR up again.

However this can be better achived by tightening your range such that you are more likely to make the best hand post flop. Betting rather than calling to reduce the number of people in the hand and targeting opponents who are likely to fold to a c-bet.
 
RogueRivered

RogueRivered

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Total posts
957
Chips
0
According to my database and tiny sample size at 2nl, 5nl, and 10nl, when you are in the SB:

It's better to raise an unopened pot with any J9o or worse hand.
It's better to call with 2+ limpers with any J9o or worse hand.
It's better to call than fold, but not by much, against 1 limper with any J9o or worse hand.

Obviously, this does not mean it will work in higher stakes, as has been pointed out many times.
 
S

switch0723

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Total posts
8,430
Chips
0
wat, so with 1 limper, its better to call with 93o than it is to fold?
 
doops

doops

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Total posts
669
Chips
0
I'd suggest sticking with (calling and unraised pot) your SB perhaps 1/5 of the time, randomly. (See my tag for your personal random generator). Raise with your SB about 1/4 of the time if it's just you and the BB. And tweak those percentages however you want.

I actually detest calling at all, but it sometimes makes sense in the SB. I like raising with whatever, though -- since you are going to be out of position, it makes sense to create a sense of strength. Also, since we are presuming you are going to be trying a steal on the flop, first of all you are the raiser and you are therefore expected to bet out. And if they all fold, then the pot is already bigger than the blinds.

This sort of play has the advantage that it can bring the people who limp with big hands out into the open a bit sooner, so you can fold like the wind...
 
T

ted80

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Total posts
467
Chips
0
of every position i play (no i dont have stats, don't make me prove it)...i think i fold sb the most. even marginal hands i might limp with in other spots, i might fold in the sb, i dont' know why, i hate the sb, it should be against the rules to be in the sb. i'm generally playing a hand i'm willing to also go all-in with pre-flop, if need be, from the sb. its not a spot i consider anything to be "half-off"...i think i'm just throwing chips away adding anymore to what i'm giving up
 
Top