Stu_Ungar
Legend
Silver Level
I was reading an artical about convergence of data yesterday and started to wonder if most stats were actually of any real value in microstakes.
The reason being that I seldom have more than a couple of hundred hands on an opponent.. and usually I have none.
Things like V$IP and PFR have a very low convergence son within a hundred hands the results are fairly accurate, but most other stats have such a high convergence point that they are meaningless without 1-2K hands (which I won't have)
The easiest one here to talk about is PF 3-bet. The games I play have little PF 3-betting, so when it happens its difficult to float it because I simply dont have the stats to put someone on a 3-bet range.
Anyone think the same.. or think different.. if so how and why.
The reason being that I seldom have more than a couple of hundred hands on an opponent.. and usually I have none.
Things like V$IP and PFR have a very low convergence son within a hundred hands the results are fairly accurate, but most other stats have such a high convergence point that they are meaningless without 1-2K hands (which I won't have)
The easiest one here to talk about is PF 3-bet. The games I play have little PF 3-betting, so when it happens its difficult to float it because I simply dont have the stats to put someone on a 3-bet range.
Anyone think the same.. or think different.. if so how and why.