momoney2
Rock Star
Silver Level
I checked out and read Harrington on Hold'em Vol 1 earlier this year, and found a lot of valuable information in it. And since I've always suggested that when it comes to poker books, "Check it out from your local library first. Then if you like it, go ahead and buy it." I finally got around to buying all 3 volumes a few months ago. (I got a great deal with a AAA discount from B&N.)
But now onto the point, I finished re-reading Vol 1 about a week ago and just started reading Vol 2 the last few days. I was reading Harrington's advice on Low M stack sizes and Red Zone play, and was quite surprised to see the play that "Action Dan" recommends.
If any of you have read HOH'E Vol 2, and can offer your take on Red Zone play, I would really appreciate hearing your opinions. For me I totally agree with aggressive all-in play when your stack is short, but all-in with T6o when the BB has 1/2 his chips already in the pot? Even from the cut-off this seems way too aggressive with a likely call from the BB.
But it may be this lack of aggression on my part that has prevented me from cashing more frequently.
But now onto the point, I finished re-reading Vol 1 about a week ago and just started reading Vol 2 the last few days. I was reading Harrington's advice on Low M stack sizes and Red Zone play, and was quite surprised to see the play that "Action Dan" recommends.
If any of you have read HOH'E Vol 2, and can offer your take on Red Zone play, I would really appreciate hearing your opinions. For me I totally agree with aggressive all-in play when your stack is short, but all-in with T6o when the BB has 1/2 his chips already in the pot? Even from the cut-off this seems way too aggressive with a likely call from the BB.
But it may be this lack of aggression on my part that has prevented me from cashing more frequently.