The Future of Live Poker

P

paulyd

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Total posts
157
Chips
0
Does anyone here think poker will get more and more unpopular to the point where there are going to be rarely much fish at the table? Now we see there definitely aren't as bad players anymore like it use to be but does anyone think there is a chance the live games can get so bad where even the worst players aren't that that horrible?


Such as sure that guy is horrible and way too loose but he plays super aggressive like a maniac? Obviously a table full of loose passive players is the best.


Also do you guys think in the future, that any game might surpass no limit holdem? We hear about the oh pot limit omaha is the game of the future but when you look at the casinos, rarely does pLO even run ever. And if it does, rarely is it more than 1 table or 2.


I know back then before NL holdem exploded on tv and the casinos, the main games were limit holdem and stud.


Also we see games like that rarely go unless its at the commerce etc.



Do any live pros here wonder if the games might not be there anymore?
 
Egon Towst

Egon Towst

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Total posts
6,794
Chips
0
I assume you`re an American ? Poker in the rest of the world is perfectly healthy, and I doubt the question would occur to the rest of us. Where I sit, in the UK, the choice of games available to me, both live and online, is probably better than it`s ever been.
 
WEC

WEC

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 28, 2007
Total posts
5,730
Chips
0
Does anyone here think poker will get more and more unpopular to the point where there are going to be rarely much fish at the table? Now we see there definitely aren't as bad players anymore like it use to be but does anyone think there is a chance the live games can get so bad where even the worst players aren't that that horrible?


Such as sure that guy is horrible and way too loose but he plays super aggressive like a maniac? Obviously a table full of loose passive players is the best.


Also do you guys think in the future, that any game might surpass no limit holdem? We hear about the oh pot limit omaha is the game of the future but when you look at the casinos, rarely does pLO even run ever. And if it does, rarely is it more than 1 table or 2.


I know back then before NL holdem exploded on tv and the casinos, the main games were limit holdem and stud.


Also we see games like that rarely go unless its at the commerce etc.



Do any live pros here wonder if the games might not be there anymore?

You are not playing Live Poker anywhere if you think it is so unpopular and without fish. Please. There are fish running all over online poker, and even more playing Live. Just travel to any poker room in Los Angeles, Bay Area, San Diego, Albuquerque, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Oklahoma to name just a few and the donk stampede with full tables of players will run you over.

PLO is a side game that runs at some places, but NL is still the King for the moment until people find a game they like better. LHE was the King 10-15 years ago, Stud before that, 5 card draw before that, and I'm sure an entire history of popular games changes in the 150 years or more that poker has been played in the US.

To think poker is going anywhere makes zero sense.

PS..I laugh so hard every time I hear people say there is a shortage of fish at the tables
 
Last edited:
P

paulyd

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Total posts
157
Chips
0
What stakes do you play WEC? I play on east coast and games there even 1/2nl are a nitfest. The 2/5nl games there aren't even good, mostly full of tight nits as well. Sure there are a few action players but very rare.

You know whats funny. The last few times i was there a guy actually said im going to switch tables b/c theres no action.

Also, fish running all over online poker? You telling me where you find fish playing 200nl and up on a usa based site? Sure there are some at 100nl but very few after that.
 
dresturn2

dresturn2

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Total posts
765
Chips
0
Players here in Michigan have noticeably gotten better over the past five years but there are still many great games to be had...I think you just have to be more selective in choosing your games and dont look for the excitement and challenge of always playing at the "big table"....instead look for the easiest game to beat up.
 
TheKid84

TheKid84

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Total posts
1,196
Chips
0
Players here in michigan have noticeably gotten better over the past five years but there are still many great games to be had...I think you just have to be more selective in choosing your games and dont look for the excitement and challenge of always playing at the "big table"....instead look for the easiest game to beat up.

GO BLUE! :D
 
aa88wildbill

aa88wildbill

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Total posts
647
Chips
0
Some years you have a lot of easy money, and some years you don't. As to your other question there probably will never be a game of poker more popular than nolimit hold'em. It's like the game was made for TV! That fact alone will almost assure that no game will ever be more popular.
 
Dorugremon

Dorugremon

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Total posts
456
Awards
1
Chips
19
"Does anyone here think poker will get more and more unpopular to the point where there are going to be rarely much fish at the table? Now we see there definitely aren't as bad players anymore like it use to be but does anyone think there is a chance the live games can get so bad where even the worst players aren't that that horrible?"

Let's review. Back in 1956, the Baldwin Group used the first computers to run simulations that resulted in the first comprehensive Basic Strategy for blackjack. Six years later, Edward O. Thorpe published Beat the Dealer which sold at least 700,000 copies. These 700,000 new card counters hit Vegas, Reno, and other places so severely that Blackjack was retired by 1963...

Oh wait! That didn't happen.

Blackjack is a helluvalot easier to beat than Poker. Memorize 21 simple rules, practice card counting, and you're good to go. Even the cumbersome Thorpe Ten Count could be mastered in a few months. Even if you didn't apply the strategy deviations (these occur only at extremes of card counts) you'd do pretty well. Even if you just learned Basic, you'd be doing yourself a big favor (and cutting into the casinos' bottom lines as this makes old fashioned Blackjack essentially a break-even game).

How much did Doyle Brunson's Super System cost?

I'll call him Chet Tower, so as not to embarrass him. On this day, Chet wasn't quite ready for the poker big leagues and he had come to Las Vegas to challenge the best. I was about to take a seat in a game, as was Bobby Baldwin, another world champion.

It was shortly after I had published my original "Super/System A Course in Power Poker". Bobby was one of my expert collaborators for that book. So, Chet walks up and introduces himself, my "Super/System" clutched in one hand. He told us how much the book had improved his game since he'd purchased it yesterday. Yesterday? You can't possibly absorb the advice in a 600-page textbook in one day.

But Chet said he was eager to get started. So, we played. Now, it was obvious right away that Chet wasn't ready for big-league poker. If you counted the mistakes he made on your fingers, you needed to start using your toes inside half an hour.

And then Chet barged into the pot for a small $800 raise -- making any call fairly cheap. In fact, it was cheap enough that Bobby decided it was time to make a rare call, hoping to capitalize if he got lucky. Bobby called with 5-3 of different suits.

The flop was K-9-2. Chet checked, and Bobby decided not to be fancy. He had practically given up on the hand. So, he checked, too. The next exposed card dealt was a six. So now the board read K-9-2-6. When Chet checked, Bobby just checked right along, figuring that maybe he could catch a four and have that unbeatable straight, and if not he'd just surrender. The final card was a four. Now Bobby couldn't lose.

Chet made a small bet and Bobby sensed he could get him to call a lot more. So he made a large $36,000 raise. Chet thought long. Finally he said, dismally, "Bobby, I know you must have me beat, but I don't see how I can throw this hand away". Then he called, showed 5-3, the same unbeatable hand as Bobby's.

Not only had Chet not mastered what I'd written in "Super/System", he hadn't even mastered the knack of knowing the best possible hand. He hadn't even bothered to raise his last $12,000. He'd even considered folding before he finally called. Reluctantly.
The price of "Super System" was $100 at that time. "Super System" cost Chet Tower tens of thousands.

Doyle tells another story related to his book. This one involved a 23 y/o plumber who'd come to his home to unstop a drain. He said: "I agree with what you wrote in the book: never play a Hold 'Em hand with a queen in it". Doyle insisted he'd written no such thing. He was wrong about that. It was wayyyyyy in the back, in an appendix: "Colorful Names for Hold 'Em hands". The oddest thing was calling (A,Q) "Doyle Brunson", and not the expected "Little Slick". There was a footnote that said the name was because Doyle never played this hand, and "never" was bolded. Out of a book with well over 500 pages, that's what the 23 y/o plumber got out of it.

Fact is: those 700,000 copies of Beat the Dealer didn't make 700,000 card counters. I'd be surprised if they made 700. "Super System" didn't fill the card rooms with expert players. People are dreamers, not doers. They'll read Beat the Dealer decide it's "too hard", "I can't memorize all that stuff", they'll try card counting for a few minutes and decide they can't possibly do it. They give up before they ever try. Yeah, it's pathetic, but that's the reality. Even worse, they'll go at it in a half fast manner, full of false confidence. If anything, Beat the Dealer probably pumped up the win rate at the Blackjack tables.

They'll buy the poker books, come to sites like this one -- maybe spend months or even years there -- and not learn a damned thing. They'll believe they did, just like Chet Tower, and these books and web sites will be a constant source of fresh fish. I've seen it myself: some of the most godawful players I've seen regurgitate forums like 2+2, throw around all the latest buzz words -- "range", "equity", yada, yada, yada as fast as they throw off chips.

"...Anyone think there is a chance the live games can get so bad where even the worst players aren't that that horrible?"

Not. Gonna. Happen.
 
Organize a Home Poker Game
Top