Don't Make Big Pots Without Big Hands

salim271

salim271

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Total posts
1,678
Chips
0
I heard this phrase awhile ago when reading a article by John Juanda at the Hendon Mob site. I think it especially makes sense in tournament play, I've tried to apply it there as well as I can.

I think you should never be all in in a tournament unless its preflop, with less than a set. If you're in preflop you should be in it with at least KK and with only one other person. This of course changes when you're short stacked. Anyone think this is too loose or tight? Should two pair be included? Top two pair?
 
Double-A

Double-A

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Total posts
787
Chips
0
I think small hand/small pot is a good thing to keep in mind in big bet games.

I think we can do away with always/never thinking, except in very specific situations.

"It depends" really is the best answer for most poker questions. Knowing what it depends ON is how we profit.

We won't be open to what that is with always/never rules in our thinking.
 
salim271

salim271

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Total posts
1,678
Chips
0
"It depends" really is the best answer for most poker questions. Knowing what it depends ON is how we profit.

Yeah I think thats always true, a set on a flop with three suited cards isnt something you want to get all in with unless ur on a really loose table.
 
thepokerkid123

thepokerkid123

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Total posts
917
Chips
0
You got it a little wrong...
Hand strengths aren't absolutes. Against some fish TT pre-flop = the nuts. Against some nits QQ preflop = -1 buy in.
Same thing post flop, you can't have a rule that you wont put all of your chips on the line with less than a set, because sometimes TPTK is the nuts and sometimes a set is crushed.


The general principle behind the line is that let's say you have AJ on an A5Tr flop against your average TAG, you've got a really good hand which is probably best. However it's good for one and at most two streets of value because there is nothing that he can have that you beat that he'll put a lot of chips in with.
Heads up AJ on that flop is the effective nuts on that flop, but the more money that goes into the pot the more it's value diminishes.
 
suit2please

suit2please

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Total posts
832
Chips
0
Ive also heard the phrase, "You win small pots with big hands, and big pots with little ones" or something like that.
 
Stu_Ungar

Stu_Ungar

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 14, 2008
Total posts
6,236
Chips
0
Don't Make Big Pots Without Big Hands

If people like Durrr stuck to this rule, they would be so much easier to beat :)
 
sammyfive

sammyfive

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Total posts
128
Chips
0
This is a good rule for overall play, but I suppose it depends.
 
salim271

salim271

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Total posts
1,678
Chips
0
You got it a little wrong...
Hand strengths aren't absolutes. Against some fish TT pre-flop = the nuts.

I agree that hands strengths aren't absolutes, but TT is never the nuts... the biggest fish you're going to meet are the ones that think an ace is always good, meaning if they're playing A9 or less they have a 30 percent chance to win preflop, honestly all pocket pairs are so weak postflop, preflop play puts the gamble in poker....
 
thepokerkid123

thepokerkid123

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Total posts
917
Chips
0
If you think they'll put a lot of chips in pre-flop with Ax, TT is a hand you're playing for value regardless of how many chips go in.
 
zek

zek

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Total posts
314
Chips
0
For the OP, how much of your stack are you willing to risk on a probable race such as AK vs 99 ?

-Raymond
 
salim271

salim271

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Total posts
1,678
Chips
0
For the OP, how much of your stack are you willing to risk on a probable race such as AK vs 99 ?

-Raymond

I try my best to see a flop with AK first... too many races where i knew i would have folded if I had seen a flop. If it came down to it and i knew my opponent had 99 (impossible to really know, IMO) I would probably shove half my chips in without a second thought if I was past the bubble. I would also shove if i was shortstacked.
 
cardplayer52

cardplayer52

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Total posts
1,232
Chips
0
Yeah I think thats always true, a set on a flop with three suited cards isnt something you want to get all in with unless ur on a really loose table.

I'm almost always getting in on a flop like this. You got to figure there are so many hands that are willing to get in here that you got beat. Two pair hands over pairs as well as flush draws and even under sets are all willing to get in here. Yes there will be made flushes here as well but you still got outs even if they got a made flush. As for the rule it is a good one. Also always trying to make a big pot with a big hand is a good rule too. If you got a big hand I find it best to bet right out most of the time to build a big pot.
 
worditst

worditst

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Total posts
130
Chips
0
I agree with above poster, top set is usually good in that situation
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
Almost every really good mtt pro disagrees with you here. If you're against good players you need to have bluffs in your range to balance and against bad players you should be betting with weaker hands like top pair and stuff because they're going to call you with worse. Also everytime you call with AK to see a flop with less than 30 big blinds baby Jesus kills a kitten. Even with more it's rarely the right play unless you're playing against Nitty McNitterson and sometimes then it's just a fold.
 
Starting Hands - Poker Hand Nicknames Rankings - Poker Hands
Top