Check-Raising overrated?

Is Check-Raising Overrated?

  • Yes, Overrated

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • Good play, but not the best.

    Votes: 15 71.4%
  • Best play in NLHE

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • poop.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    21
royalburrito24

royalburrito24

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Total posts
2,417
Chips
0
My experience with check raising only really works when I am bluff check raising. When I pick up a monster, check raising is one of the farthest things from my mind. In my experience, check raising gives your opponents an even better excuse to exit the hand.

Sure check raising gets you that extra little chips from the guy with nothing, but I feel that the play is overrated unless your opponent has the second nuts to your stone cold nuts.

the only time I really check raise is when its the river, and I am holding close to the nuts and I know that my opponent will bet at the pot.

Any thoughts on the move?
Is it overrated or am I not using it enough?

Lets create a poll!
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Chips
0
c/r is like the pump-fake in basketball imo
 
Aalgaard

Aalgaard

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Total posts
31
Chips
0
I think it realy depends on the situation. If I want a call, and I think I can get it, I'll bet.

If a player is in a situation where he bets all the time, I choose check raise. I use checkraise quite a lot in Turbo if I know I have the winning hand.
 
Last edited:
Mortis

Mortis

Skeleton Crew
Loyaler
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Total posts
11,924
Awards
6
US
Chips
634
I usually check-raise when I have a big hand. Maybe I do it a bit too often.
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Since most players DON'T use the check raise, or even the reraise, they don't have a good enough understanding of what it's power is.

There are a lot of players who overuse it.

It is a tool. It is a bit more powerful than an intentional minraise with monsters. Stick it in your poker toolbag and bring it out when it is the right tool to use.
 
blankoblanco

blankoblanco

plays poker on hard mode
Silver Level
Joined
May 16, 2006
Total posts
6,129
Chips
0
the only time I really check raise is when its the river, and I am holding close to the nuts and I know that my opponent will bet at the pot.

it's a mistake, in my opinion, if you're not check raising in other spots. i love playing against people who never check raise. they're usually pretty easy to play against. once they check to me on the flop or turn, i can make my decision virtually knowing i don't have to worry about being raised if i bet and also knowing they're rarely strong. it's quite a luxury. these days you risk becoming too predictable if you're really rarely check raising. that being said, it's not the be-all end-all and you don't wanna overuse it either
 
dweezel

dweezel

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Total posts
391
Chips
0
I think the C/R is better in live play than online.
People will call anything online and slow play monsters alot .
Online its easier to C/R your chips away IMO especially when the nuts turns into the second best hand by the river.
 
OzExorcist

OzExorcist

Broomcorn's uncle
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Total posts
8,586
Awards
1
Chips
1
i love playing against people who never check raise. they're usually pretty easy to play against. once they check to me on the flop or turn, i can make my decision virtually knowing i don't have to worry about being raised if i bet and also knowing they're rarely strong.

There's an interesting accompaniment to this - in my (admittedly brief) experience, players like the ones you describe rarely recognise the strength represented by your check-raise either.

This bodes ill if you're using it as a bluff, of course, but it can be a way to get more of their money into the pot if you think they'd have just called a straight value bet.

Having said all that, I probably don't check-raise enough.
 
t1riel

t1riel

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 20, 2005
Total posts
6,919
Awards
1
Chips
16
I would only do it if I have little doubt in my mind that my opponent is going to bet if I check.
 
wsorbust

wsorbust

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Total posts
2,425
Awards
1
Chips
1
Since most players DON'T use the check raise, or even the reraise, they don't have a good enough understanding of what it's power is.
I would have to agree and say it's one of the most powerful tools of NLHE, and probably one of the last moves/plays a player learns & will truly understand when attempting to implement the game in an efficient manner. That's my opinion, I'm surely no pro, but, It's probably a good idea to know your opponent. :eek: Check that link above.

Not to take the thread off topic or anything....T1riel, I'm just wondering, are you playing mainly live or online these days?
 
Chris_TC

Chris_TC

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Total posts
925
Chips
0
Since every player is so aggressive these days, checkraising is certainly a viable option.

I much prefer a checkcall though. All the overaggressive players usually misinterpret it as weakness and bet out a 2nd time. I've stacked people who had Ace King high that way. You can really get people to bluff their money away.

This is Phil Hellmuth's style of playing. And it really does work, especially on the internet where everybody and their mother thinks they have to win every pot and be aggressive all the time.
 
zachvac

zachvac

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Total posts
7,832
Chips
0
Let's look at some situations:

1. You have monster, other guy has drawing hand
I'd never check-raise here, gives a free card if they don't bet

2. You think you have the nuts and opponent is drawing dead
If they simply have a lesser monster (such as set over set), a bet will work just as well as a check raise, and they'll probably even raise your bet, which you can then re-raise. If they have crap, check-raising gives you an extra bet. But check-calling gives them another opportunity to bluff at it

3. You have the lesser hand, but you're drawing to a better one
Although it works as a semi-bluff (and a free card if they check behind you), the problem is you give action back to your opponent, they can then raise, forcing you to fold. The best would be a call and then you hitting, and your hand would be very well disguised

4. You have the lesser hand, and you only win if they fold
This is the place I like it the most. If you're with an opponent who likes to steal a lot with cbets, you can check and then raise their cbet. Most of the time they'll fold, unless they really have a hand.
 
reglardave

reglardave

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Total posts
2,264
Chips
0
It's a great move against an aggressive opponent when you hit a monster, but you need a pretty good reaf on the other player, 'cause you want value, and checking to someone who checks behind doesn't get it. Normally, as Chuck pointed out, leading with a strong hand often gets better results.

But, say you hit a dream flop, boat on the flop for example. I will often check, and if you get a bet, check call first; check again at 4th st., and then hit the rerause. There's little risk involved, and the worst that can happen is villain will slow down and check behind, but if this happens you were gonna lose him anyway..

Because I play at low stakes, I find using the check/raise as a bluff is very dangerous; you'll be in against opponents who don't understand the concept.
 
royalburrito24

royalburrito24

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Total posts
2,417
Chips
0
imo there is nothing worse than a check-raise bluff that goes wrong. I normally dont do it on a ragged flop. Normally i will check raise bluff when there is a QQ5 on the board or something like that because if they are betting, most likely they are bluffing as well and it is very easy to represent that Q.
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Chips
0
I stand by the post I made when I was drunk. (read above)
 
royalburrito24

royalburrito24

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Total posts
2,417
Chips
0
I stand by the post I made when I was drunk. (read above)

doesnt seem like you are drunk....
then again i hardly drink and probably wouldnt know the difference
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Chips
0
Well, at the time, I was like, "This probly won't even make any sense", but I still posted it, and now that I think about it, it's a perfect analogy, DUCY?
 
royalburrito24

royalburrito24

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Total posts
2,417
Chips
0
yea its a very nice post, you should try playing drunk some time....against me :D

and i might need clarification on the word "DUCY"
 
royalburrito24

royalburrito24

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Total posts
2,417
Chips
0
Heads-up 4 rollz tonight after Pats game?
most likely sure. Depending on who wins the pats game..Pats win, I dont play, ravens win? then maybe we will play


Acronym, try to pronounce it out loud.

still dont get it, you are probably better off just telling me or leaving it alone
 
blankoblanco

blankoblanco

plays poker on hard mode
Silver Level
Joined
May 16, 2006
Total posts
6,129
Chips
0
lol you'll maybe play if the ravens win

translation: when hell freezes over
 
royalburrito24

royalburrito24

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Total posts
2,417
Chips
0
lol you'll maybe play if the ravens win

translation: when hell freezes over

precisely my plan

i have never seen him play, so i do not want to end up losing all me monies
 
Top