Kasanova King
Visionary
Silver Level
Ok, it's relatively common knowledge that the top cash game pros win on average at least 2/3 of their sessions. Now, will a break even session or slightly up count towards that 2/3? I've had a decent month (February), up double digit buy ins, I've won slightly more than 50% of my sessions but I've also broke even in about 25% of them (or close to it) and lost about 25% over about a 25k hand sample.
My question is, should I push to win more sessions by taking less risks so those break even sessions will be positive...even if they are marginally positive? Or should I continue to take risks and try to win more money per session and accept the break even sessions for what they are?
What I mean by risks is things like calling all ins pre (with about even stack sizes) with QQ if I put villain on AK, races, coin flips, etc.
My question is, should I push to win more sessions by taking less risks so those break even sessions will be positive...even if they are marginally positive? Or should I continue to take risks and try to win more money per session and accept the break even sessions for what they are?
What I mean by risks is things like calling all ins pre (with about even stack sizes) with QQ if I put villain on AK, races, coin flips, etc.