C
cotta777
Visionary
Silver Level
just a quick post not an essay, a bit of food for thought...
there are some old school storys about some pro legends basically grinding out their livings one tabling...
and theirs an old legend not brunson and not same era but hes pushing 60 now but another man (i cannot remember his name - TBC)
he basically said a pro can have a winning session 95% percent of the time sat down at a table assumingly with amateurs or break even players.
and a winning player/good player will win 7 out of ten times maybe..
also online if you can 1/2 table at 25.50 or 50.1 and you never lose a buy in.
either profiting or coming away closeto evens...
than gradually you could turn $200.00 into 1,000 at a 25.50 table.
this may take 6 weeks online..
4 weeks live,
but in general does this go against the theory of brm... I know variance can kill.
but what if you dont take those big tosses or those pots when your a favourate and you have all your bankroll at risk.
but insteadyou grind small potsand you pick off your opponents in orphaned pots and when your heads up isolated and you know your ahead and have pot control...
yes potentially you lose value... but you avoid variance and adventually you will have built yourself a bankroll big enough now open up your game and allow the swings to counteract your big pots....
I mean ive actually tried and tested with a cautious style and picking of pots and avoiding risking my whole stack when i still have a chance of losing.
and its apparent variance can be controlled?
this is exploitable live, but with so many online tables if you get found out you can just move tables
anyone agree/disagree?
there are some old school storys about some pro legends basically grinding out their livings one tabling...
and theirs an old legend not brunson and not same era but hes pushing 60 now but another man (i cannot remember his name - TBC)
he basically said a pro can have a winning session 95% percent of the time sat down at a table assumingly with amateurs or break even players.
and a winning player/good player will win 7 out of ten times maybe..
also online if you can 1/2 table at 25.50 or 50.1 and you never lose a buy in.
either profiting or coming away closeto evens...
than gradually you could turn $200.00 into 1,000 at a 25.50 table.
this may take 6 weeks online..
4 weeks live,
but in general does this go against the theory of brm... I know variance can kill.
but what if you dont take those big tosses or those pots when your a favourate and you have all your bankroll at risk.
but insteadyou grind small potsand you pick off your opponents in orphaned pots and when your heads up isolated and you know your ahead and have pot control...
yes potentially you lose value... but you avoid variance and adventually you will have built yourself a bankroll big enough now open up your game and allow the swings to counteract your big pots....
I mean ive actually tried and tested with a cautious style and picking of pots and avoiding risking my whole stack when i still have a chance of losing.
and its apparent variance can be controlled?
this is exploitable live, but with so many online tables if you get found out you can just move tables
anyone agree/disagree?