re: Poker & Bankroll Management based on Player Pool
Originally Posted by BenjiHustle
I actually agree with this 100%. I've just never outright said it and I'm not entirely sure if it's true. I do see some pretty liberal action taking place on PS and FTP and 888 even, really. So if we had PS to play on, do you think your bankroll management standards would be more liberal or more stringent; or maybe even just the same?
I'd have to take a wait and see approach, you know? I would keep my bankroll standards the same and then see how things go. If after a decent sample size my winrate was considerably higher once things "open up" to everyone again (so to speak) well then I would naturally rerun the math and see if 30, 40, or 50+ buy ins was really necessary.
I'm sure if the industry changed that much, so would the bankroll recommendations that pros were giving up and comers. I'm sure of one thing, though: It would still never hurt to have too much $...only too little