R
RVladimiro
Visionary
Silver Level
I'm currently a tight passive player. The reason for this is that it's working mostly because people keep betting into me with worse hands. By keeping my PF3bet% low and my postflop aggression also low I don't get into difficult spots and get some value.
Thing is I'm divided about aggression. On one hand I think that don't fold enough to play draws aggressively, on the other hand I think they fold too much if I raise for value. For this reason I'm as deceptive as possible and that usually means call/call/raise.
It's a obvious contradiction! I'm aware of it! So the question is: in which spots should I be aggressive? Value only? Does that include TPTK considering the overwhelming cbet% nowadays? Should I raise only monster draws or even ship it? Should I bet everytime someone does not cbet? What about PF should I keep passive to keep them in or flat QQ+ to 3bets?
Too many doubts... too little aggression...
I want to be more aggressive but I never felt that aggression IP without initiative was bringing me value. Being aggressive OOP with initiative is not an issue.
(just re-read the post... what a mess... waiting for criticism)
Thing is I'm divided about aggression. On one hand I think that don't fold enough to play draws aggressively, on the other hand I think they fold too much if I raise for value. For this reason I'm as deceptive as possible and that usually means call/call/raise.
It's a obvious contradiction! I'm aware of it! So the question is: in which spots should I be aggressive? Value only? Does that include TPTK considering the overwhelming cbet% nowadays? Should I raise only monster draws or even ship it? Should I bet everytime someone does not cbet? What about PF should I keep passive to keep them in or flat QQ+ to 3bets?
Too many doubts... too little aggression...
I want to be more aggressive but I never felt that aggression IP without initiative was bringing me value. Being aggressive OOP with initiative is not an issue.
(just re-read the post... what a mess... waiting for criticism)