Adding suited connectors to my range.

H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
I am widening my range in order to make me less of a nit. I wanted to add 67s-10Js. I want to check I understand the basics of playing suited connectors. I am playing at the micro stake level.

Firstly you have to be aggressive with SCs. The amount of times you flop huge hands will be very few and fair between and if it's a flush you're unlikely to be paid off. Therefore you have to be willing to Cbet against players who often fold to cbets and re-raise against players who often cbet and fold when 3 bet. Therefore these stats of the potential opponents should be checked before I call a PFR or before undertaking a PFR.

The circumstances when I will play SCs

  • if they are suited (3% more equity);
  • if I am in late position;
  • calling a PFR for no more than 5% of my stack;
  • if my opponent and I have big stacks (greater implied odds);
  • the potential opponents fold to a cbet often (I don't know a figure to put on this to make this profitable say 50%+); and
  • or the opponent cbets often but folds to a 3bet a higher % of the time (again I have no idea what this figure should be)

Specific actions

If I catch a flush draw (2 suited cards on flop) and OESD I over bet the pot or re-raise all in if they bet.

If I catch a flush draw and GSSD I will be doing similar (not always depending on the pot odds and how many players I'm against) as above as I still have around 45% equity not including fold equity.

If I miss completely I have to be willing to c-bet a lot and re-raise c-bets to make these hands profitable. This is why I need to check my potential opponents hands before calling/raising with these hands pre flop.

If they re-raise my c-bet I will probably fold. If they call my re-raise and the turn card is a scary one I may have a go at it but I will most likely check/fold.

I would like your thoughts on whether I understand how to play these hands correctly, any advice about what %'s I should be looking for in my potential opponents stats and any other advice on how to play these tricky hands.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
How big of a nit are you currently? You can get yourself out of nitdom without ever playing small SCs other than on the BTN.
 
H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
6k hands 14/10. I guess the reason isn't just to get out of nitdom it's more to have a wider range that I know will be valuable when I move up the stakes.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Work on narrowing your Vpip/Pfr gap before adding anything new except on the BTN imo.
 
H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
Yeah, I'm working on that. My last sessions have been:

11.4/9.2 400 hands
8.8/8 114 hands
15.7/13 256 hands.

Not perfect but all moving closer. What is an acceptable difference as PFR doesn't include calls and sometimes calling is correct with strong but not hands you're strong enough to 3bet with. eg. AQ/AJ/mid pairs.
 
H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
Small volume but I think the trend is clear.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
I'd say something like a 2% gap is standard for most TAGish players.
 
H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
I'm not too far off then. How about my circumstances for suited connectors then WVH, sound reasonable?
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
I'm not a fan of calling a single opener with them in most circumstances tbh.
 
H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
Is this because of the tricky situations you can end up in? I feel like I'm wasting an opportunity when I fold one of these hands in the CO/Btn with no raiser before me.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Well with no raiser in front of you opening them yourself from LP is fine.

I was saying I don't like calling a raise with them. So a player opens in EP/MP and we have 87s on the BTN. I like folding or 3betting (mostly folding) SCs better than calling
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
Well with no raiser in front of you opening them yourself from LP is fine.

I was saying I don't like calling a raise with them. So a player opens in EP/MP and we have 87s on the BTN. I like folding or 3betting (mostly folding) SCs better than calling

I'm with WV here. When you flat SC's, your plan for the hand is to either semibluff after the flop, or play for implied odds with a hand that isnt super great at making huge hands. Both plans kinda suck. I think you need the extra EV that being the preflop aggressor gives you to play the small SC's profitably.

However, being suited and connected does add a lot of value to a hand, especially if you're deep. Hands like QJs don't get enough love.
 
H

Humps

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Total posts
239
Awards
1
Chips
0
Yeah semi bluffs are hard in low stakes as you always have the chance of coming up against a station.

Not to mention how many difficult situations I will get myself into.

I'd try them from LP as the first to raise to hopefully pick up blinds or take the pot with a c-bet.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
It looks like you're focusing on playing SCs in situations where the pots are likely to be two-handed. While you can play SCs profitably against one opponent if you pick your spots, at micros, it's not uncommon to see pots with multiple limpers. Although you don't have the same ability to win these pots via post-flop aggression, they present opportunities to limp as well. Seeing these flops is inexpensive, and when you do flop a strong hand, the chances of being paid off are better since any of those opponents can have enough to do so.
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
Although you don't have the same ability to win these pots via post-flop aggression, they present opportunities to punish the hell out of limpers.
fyp
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
SCs are useful as air in a polarized 3-bet range or to balance your sets with big draws in your calling range.
 
TeUnit

TeUnit

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Total posts
4,790
Awards
14
Chips
104
the other thing i would consider is effective stack sizes, ie if your opponents are shortstacked you may not want to play them
 
B

BlueNowhere

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Total posts
4,234
Chips
0
It looks like you're focusing on playing SCs in situations where the pots are likely to be two-handed. While you can play SCs profitably against one opponent if you pick your spots, at micros, it's not uncommon to see pots with multiple limpers. Although you don't have the same ability to win these pots via post-flop aggression, they present opportunities to limp as well. Seeing these flops is inexpensive, and when you do flop a strong hand, the chances of being paid off are better since any of those opponents can have enough to do so.

Would it not be better to squeeze in this spot?
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
the other thing i would consider is effective stack sizes, ie if your opponents are shortstacked you may not want to play them
Definitely. If calling full stacks with SCs is questionable at best, calling shortys with them is horrible.
Would it not be better to squeeze in this spot?
Not really a squeeze if it's just limpers but raising to collect all that bad player money is 100% correct.
 
B

Big_Rudy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Total posts
1,833
Chips
0
Firstly you have to be aggressive with SCs....

Ok. Coming late to the discussion, but anyways.... I disagree with the above assertion, for the most part, in the micros.

I would only play SC under very specifc circumstances. This all pertains to my experiences at full-ring low-level micro-stakes, so for 6-max or higher stakes things may be totally different.

Anyway, for me the ideal situation is from LP, deep stacked table, with several EP and/or MP limpers (quite likely at the micros) or, at most a smallish raise and a couple of flat callers in front of me (somewhat less likely, but still happens fairly often at the micros). In short, when I risk only a small % of my stack and hope to flop big or at least a big draw.

If I play them, frequently I'm folding them- but if I do play them, I'm playing them strictly for implied odds value. I'd play them passively from LP, not aggressively. Before everyone cringes and I get flamed, remember we are talking the micros here.

Ask yourself how many times you have raised several EP/MP limpers and all or most of them have folded to your raise. In my experience this seldom happens. Generally, at the micros, if someone limps and/or raises, they are calling your LP raise unless you make it ridiculously large.

Raising with SC, then, would seem to be counter-productive unless 1) the limpers/ min-raisers will fold pre-flop to your aggression (not likely in my experience), or 2) assuming that they do come along that they will fold to a c-bet if you don't flop big (again frquently not likely that they all will fold to a c-bet at the micros).

Remember, they are generally not folding if they caught any part of the flop, they are not usually folding Ax for a single bet or c-bet, and thet are not folding any type of straight and/or flush draw for even a pot-sized bet, they may also not be folding any 2 random broadways either.

C9 and WVH seem to be fans of raising to punish the EP/MP limpers/min-raisers. And while this may be, and certainly probably is true, at higher stakes, remember, this is the micros. The limpers aren't folding to your LP raise/3-bet. After that, they are not folding on the flop if they have any chance at any type of hand (with several limp/callers at least some of them will fit this description).

Which leads me, finally, to my point. If I'm going to play them, play them IP, cheaply, deepstacked, and against players who over-value hands like TPTK. Play them passively pre since you're not folding anyone out anyway and your pre-flop equity is likely pretty bad against several villains. Assuming you flop good, then start firing away. If you just flop a draw I'd check or call smallish bets and not show any aggression that won't be respected anyway. The micros (again full-ring) is all about betting strong made hands for value and chack/calling smallish raises to see your draws cheaply.

Sorry this is so tl;dr .... Just wanted to explain my reasoning since I'm sure its likely to be disagreed with;) .
 
Last edited:
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
Playing passively against bad loose players is ridiculous.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Playing passively against bad loose players is ridiculous.
Agreed.

Also I'm playing 10nl now after starting again at 4nl on Merge and I know C9 has played a lot of 2nl (he said it relaxed him or something like that). Trust me when I tell you that isoing limpers is a goldmine at all levels.
 
B

Big_Rudy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Total posts
1,833
Chips
0
Playing passively against bad loose players is ridiculous.

Depends. How do you plan to win the hand? Can we agree you are at least IP? What is your aggression from LP going to accomplish? Are you folding the limpers out? If yes then be aggressive.

In the real world, at the micros, you aren't folding them out. So, you want to play aggressively against bad, loose players when you are behind? Works well when you flop huge, less so when you don't flop much (which will be the usual outcome). SC, especially mid-range SC are rarely the best hand pre against several villains and your aggression isn't getting them out of the hand pre or post flop if they have any type of hand or draw. So, why are we being aggressive when we are behind and likely can't chase everyone out? (I'm assuming you didn't flop much here, obv.)

Trust me when I tell you that isoing limpers is a goldmine at all levels.

Ok, I might be a little more inclined to agree with this if it were possible. My premise is you usually aren't going to be able to isolate one of several limpers pre-flop And, even if you can, you are still likely behind their range and they aren't going anywhere unless you are prepared to be VERY aggressive on multiple streets. Remember, we are likely behind and our opponents will call the vast majority of our bets.

Why then are we being aggressive when we are behind and they won't respect our aggression? I'm seriously asking. I'm not trying to be smart or disagreeable. I simply don't understand your reasoning.

The micros (again full-ring) is all about betting strong made hands for value and check/calling smallish raises to see your draws cheaply.

Still stick with this unless someone can show me a better way.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Ok, I might be a little more inclined to agree with this if it were possible. My premise is you usually aren't going to be able to isolate one of several limpers pre-flop And, even if you can, you are still likely behind their range and they aren't going anywhere unless you are prepared to be VERY aggressive on multiple streets. Remember, we are likely behind and our opponents will call the vast majority of our bets.
I am.

You seem to think that they know they're ahead of us. They don't. So we cbet most flops (they fold here most of the time) and continue betting on good turn cards (both scare cards and cards that give us equity).
 
Top