A confusing session - too much aggression?
I just finished a session that has me puzzled. I was at a 2NL FR table for about an hour, played 54 hands, won .60, and never had a showdown. I was following fx's strategy, though I did play two hands outside that (K7s on the button and KJs late MP) and I was VP: 25/PF: 21/AF:71.
I played 17 hands (I'm not counting blinds I folded) and won 13 of them. One blind went to the river, but the villain folded when I bet .02 just out of curiosity. Not one of the other hands even got to the river.
Is c-betting that powerful? It did seem most of the players were tight/passive but still ... I've never seen this happen before. Was I being too aggressive perhaps? I was entering with 3BB + 1BB per limper and never bet more than 1/2 pot on the flop, though I did reraise a bet on a Qxx board with KK, which was probably a mistake 'cause he folded.
I'm not so much complaining - because I obviously didn't HIT 13 of 17 hands - but I didn't get any play when I did hit. I was playing more than usual - my usual VP is about 14 - but I was getting the hands to play. Just a weird coincidence or should I start checking some on the flop with monsters?