7 Signs of a TAGfish ....... Are you one?

Emrald Onyxx

Emrald Onyxx

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Total posts
106
Chips
0
Discussion on another article by Daniel Skolovy ............

Top 7 Signs You're a TAGfish
User rating: 4.73 out of 5 (320 votes)



Okay. So I read another Daniel Skolovy article and wanted to bring it up for discussion here on CC.

Basically, the nuts and bolts of the article were how to identify if you are a TAGfish. Most everyone reading this will know what a TAG (Tight Aggressive) player is, but many might not understand that a TAG player might not be the same as a Winning player.

Identifying all TAG players as winning players could be a huge mistake!

Daniel points this out by saying a TAGfish player initially looks just like a winning TAG player, but they are actually just breaking at even or under. A TAGfish player will buy-in with the full buy-in amount. They will top off every hand. They will have decent stats, and think they are playing poker right, but they can't seem to rake in the pots for a winning average.

Daniel goes on to point out the reason for this, just as so many other books and instructions say as well, "Poker is a game of Situations!"

No matter how many books you read. No matter how many hands you play. And no matter how many times you look at your stats from you latest HUD review. You will not be a winning poker player unless you realize that main point. Poker is a game of situations. It's not a game of hole cards, and it's definitely not a game of stats!


Quoted from Daniel's article:
"That's because there's more to poker than having good stats. Poker is a thinking man's game; you can't just imitate what you've read and become some money-printing robot.

You have to be able to apply what you've learned and make good decisions each time the action is on you.

A TAGfish doesn't. He just plays the same game all day, every day, no matter the situation. And he perpetually loses/breaks even, thinking he's the most unlucky player on the face of the earth."


So much for a summary, sorry........

Daniel has broken the identifiers of a TAGfish into 7 signs, I am quoting directly from the article from this point:


1) You think about your opponent's range but never your own

Everyone knows you have to try to put your opponent on a range. It's one of the most fundamental skills in poker.

But a TAGfish doesn't think about his own range in doing so. An opponent is going to play the hand a few different ways according to what he thinks you have.

You'll never be able to accurately put your opponent on a range without first thinking about your own perceived range.

2) You misapply skills you've learned

A TAGfish tries to learn to play better poker. He watches videos, read articles and studies the game extensively. But he misapplies the information he's learned.

He'll learn that continuation betting and giving up is bad, so he'll just fire every second barrel.

He'll learn that to exploit players that c-bet too much you can float the flop and take away the pot on the turn, but he'll float with pure air instead of gutshots or hands with backdoor capabilities.

He'll learn that three-betting light is profitable, but he'll do it regardless of his opponent's three-bet calling frequency. And he'll do it with the wrong hands.

He only learns half the skills. He knows what to do, but then misapplies when he should be doing it and who he should be doing it against.

3) You call the same range in the cut-off as you do on the button

A TAGfish treats the cut-off and the button as the exact same position. If an opponent raises from early position, he'll call in the cut-off with 6
h.gif
9
h.gif
thinking it's perfectly fine because he'll be playing the pot in position.


But that just isn't the case. You've still got one more player to act behind you and if he's any good, he can make your life a living hell.

That player can three-bet with impunity whenever you call with your weak, speculative hand, he can call and steal your post-flop position and he can punish you after the flop.

Where good TAGs abuse the button, a TAGfish allows himself to be abused by the button.

4) You overestimate your implied odds

A TAGfish thinks every time he makes the nuts he's going to win a stack. He thinks if he calls from the blinds with a pocket pair and nails a set, he's going to win an opponent's whole stack every time.

So he calls with his speculative hands post-flop, check-folds when he misses and, when he finally makes that huge hand, he makes his opponent fold.

He bleeds all his money trying to hit that hand and then when he does hit, he never makes that money back.

5) You have leaks post-flop

A TAGfish typically plays fine pre-flop. He has that part of the game solved to a degree.

He knows he can't limp Q9o upfront and expect to show a profit. He knows AK needs to be raised for value, etc. But once the flop comes, his mistakes start to compound.

Knowing when to fold pre-flop is easy. But knowing when to ditch top pair, bad kicker isn't. Knowing when to double barrel and when to triple barrel is hard.

A TAGfish plays his own cards too often and the situation and his opponents not nearly enough.

6) You look at each decision as a separate entity

A TAGfish gets caught up in a tough decision and thinks, "Man, this spot sucks. What the hell do I do?" Really, it's not what he just did that put him in that spot; it's what he did earlier in the hand.

He doesn't have a plan in mind for the hand. He just acts and figures it out from there. He plays reactive poker instead of proactive poker.

7) You tilt too much

A TAGfish doesn't tilt in the true "five-bet ship 58o" sense of the word.
But when he's losing, he definitely doesn't play his best. He rushes decisions. He slips into auto pilot. And, worst of all, he plays far too long.

A TAGfish loves trying to get unstuck and will play all day trying to get unstuck - all the while playing C- game poker. Yet when he has a winning day, he'll quit early and play small sessions, booking a small win.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If this sounds a lot like you, don't worry. TAGfish syndrome is curable.
The answer: concentrate on making the best decision every single time the action is on you and take your time. Sometimes the best possible play won't come to you right away.

But if you do your best to think about the benefits of each possible decision, you'll be making more good decisions and less bad ones.

If you want to win more money - and stop being a TAGfish, that's exactly where you need to start.
 
L

luckytokenz

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Total posts
154
Chips
0
Great thread, I identified some of my own flaws within.
 
Makwa

Makwa

Undesirable Predator
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Total posts
6,080
Chips
0
Txs, good points, I will think harder and longer about more variables... (I think I can I know I can :eek:).
 
Panamajoe

Panamajoe

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Total posts
1,382
Chips
0
guilty, guilty, guilty.... u been watching me too much dude.:eek:

But seriously good tips!

TAGfish... hmmm:eek:
 
kesza

kesza

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Total posts
28
Chips
0
Thanks, great tips. Especially the 7th, it seems I'm a TAGfish :).
 
PNJs_dad

PNJs_dad

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Total posts
403
Chips
0
Great thread. I'm about to really try to play cash games seriously. I hope to learn from the successful players here. I've never been a strong cash game player. I think I try to play for cash the exact same way I play in tourneys. Thanks for the info.
 
deucem

deucem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Total posts
147
Chips
0
Should the tagged fish be released after you catch one?
 
M33K3R

M33K3R

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Total posts
387
Chips
0
Great thread! I have one or two of those, and I'll have to take my time for decision and adjust better.
 
Agile Beauce

Agile Beauce

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Total posts
107
Chips
0
Okay, so now I have a name for what I am. There is a lot of info to identify a TAGfish, but not enough info on how to stop being a TAGfish.

"he misapplies the information he's learned."

Yep, this is me. How do you fix this?

"
He only learns half the skills. He knows what to do, but then misapplies when he should be doing it and who he should be doing it against."

Guilty again. I have been learning the what but still don't have the when and who.

"
Where good TAGs abuse the button, a TAGfish allows himself to be abused by the button."

Yep, this has been known to happen to me too. Do you only play when you are on the button? What ranges do you play when in the other positions? I have been experimenting with the info I have learned, but have been failing miserably. What hands do you play on the button (I know some will say any hand), but when do you go strong with nothing? It is an easy decision if it has been folded around to you and both blinds are short stacked. It is also easy if you have 72 and there is an all in caller ahead of you. But I have trouble with the gray area in between the extremes, trying to figure out if I should fold or represent a strong hand when I'm on the button.

"
He bleeds all his money trying to hit that hand and then when he does hit, he never makes that money back."
"A TAGfish plays his own cards too often and the situation and his opponents not nearly enough."

This happens sometimes, but I am getting a little better. I still don't consider EVERY hand my opponent can have. Tonight I had KK and the board was Q9QJK. I figured I had the nuts with Kings Full. I put my opponent on trip Queens, a straight, or maybe Queens full. Unfortunately, my opponent had QQ and hit quads. Twice today I have been beaten like this by the single possible hand that can beat my hand (both times beaten by quads when I had a FH). How do you know when your "monster" hand is really good enough?

"He plays reactive poker instead of proactive poker."

Yep, this is a hard one to correct.

"
The answer: concentrate on making the best decision every single time the action is on you and take your time."

There has to be more to it then this. I try to concentrate on making the best decision, but I'm still a TAGfish. There must be more.














 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
Okay, so now I have a name for what I am. There is a lot of info to identify a TAGfish, but not enough info on how to stop being a TAGfish.

"he misapplies the information he's learned."

Yep, this is me. How do you fix this?

Only through analysis of your game. Self-analysis is critical, but it's also very helpful to have someone else critique your play, either through a sweat session or by posting a video and soliciting feedback.

"
He only learns half the skills. He knows what to do, but then misapplies when he should be doing it and who he should be doing it against."

Guilty again. I have been learning the what but still don't have the when and who.

"
Where good TAGs abuse the button, a TAGfish allows himself to be abused by the button."

Yep, this has been known to happen to me too. Do you only play when you are on the button? What ranges do you play when in the other positions? I have been experimenting with the info I have learned, but have been failing miserably. What hands do you play on the button (I know some will say any hand), but when do you go strong with nothing? It is an easy decision if it has been folded around to you and both blinds are short stacked. It is also easy if you have 72 and there is an all in caller ahead of you. But I have trouble with the gray area in between the extremes, trying to figure out if I should fold or represent a strong hand when I'm on the button.

Are you a tourney player? I ask cuz of your comment about both blinds being ss'd, and a correct move in an MTT may be an incorrect move in a cash game (antes+escalating blinds relative to stack sizes have an impact on the decision in MTT's that are different from cash games). But generally, if you have an agg 3bet happy BTN behind you when you're CO, you can't open pure junk in CO unless you're confident BTN will fold nicely to 4bets. Also, your comments are really pf. How well can your hand hit the board if BTN calls? Does BTN fold nicely to cbets or does he like to float?

"
He bleeds all his money trying to hit that hand and then when he does hit, he never makes that money back."
"A TAGfish plays his own cards too often and the situation and his opponents not nearly enough."

This happens sometimes, but I am getting a little better. I still don't consider EVERY hand my opponent can have. Tonight I had KK and the board was Q9QJK. I figured I had the nuts with Kings Full. I put my opponent on trip Queens, a straight, or maybe Queens full. Unfortunately, my opponent had QQ and hit quads. Twice today I have been beaten like this by the single possible hand that can beat my hand (both times beaten by quads when I had a FH). How do you know when your "monster" hand is really good enough?

You will never, ever, ever be able to put Villain on quads when you're holding the nut full house. Don't bother trying, it happens too infrequently to have a long term neg impact on your winrate, and folding the nut full house on the suspicion Villain has quads will have a tremendous neg impact on your winrate (Villain will almost always show up w a worse hand than the nut fh).Your monster hand is good enough when you believe it to likely be better than the hand Villain is holding. Did you see the vid of the royal flush beating quad A's in the WSOP? The guy w quad A's did not make a mistake shoving there, it's tremendously unlikely that his hand is second best (man, did I feel his pain)- and the worst that his hand could possibly be is second best - the second nuts is almost always a monster worth pushing, esp if you see likely third and fourth best hands that will call.

"He plays reactive poker instead of proactive poker."

Yep, this is a hard one to correct.

"
The answer: concentrate on making the best decision every single time the action is on you and take your time."

There has to be more to it then this. I try to concentrate on making the best decision, but I'm still a TAGfish. There must be more.

There is, but too much to put in one article. Read c9's required reading list in the ring game HA forum for more.














gl!!!
 
Last edited:
jacksprat

jacksprat

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Total posts
138
Chips
0
I'm a tagfish from 2 of the 7, never would have thought it....Much to ponder....Interesting post.
 
Emrald Onyxx

Emrald Onyxx

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Total posts
106
Chips
0
Okay, so now I have a name for what I am. There is a lot of info to identify a TAGfish, but not enough info on how to stop being a TAGfish.

"he misapplies the information he's learned."

Yep, this is me. How do you fix this?

This was addressed in the preface of the thread, "Poker is a game of Situations!"

I once read a book on how to bake cookies. It told me to how mix the ingredients in a bowl. Cut them out and place them on a pan and then bake in a preheated oven at a very specific temperature. I did exactly as the book told me, and the cookies were great!

But what the book didn't tell me, was that I don't bake every cookie recipe that exact same way. Instead it simply gives other recipes for other types of cookies. Some are no bake, some are made with different ingredients, and others only needed a slightly different temperature to bake at.

The point is......... that there are MANY different ways to bake cookies. What was the best solution for one situation, might not always be the best solution for every situation. Even though it might not actully say this in the cookie book; I wouldn't make 'No-bake' cookies in the oven.

I also wouldn't play the Fish in the Cutoff the same way as I would play the TAG in early position. No matter how many books you read, you won't find a Cookie-Cutter Move for every situation. You have to "Think" about what is the right move for each situation as every situation is unique in it's own way with it's own variables.

So......
How do you fix this??

Take the time to stop and think.

Agile Beauce said:
He only learns half the skills. He knows what to do, but then misapplies when he should be doing it and who he should be doing it against."

Guilty again. I have been learning the what but still don't have the when and who.

I have a hard time understanding where you are getting information about the "What" without the "When" or "Who." The book might now directly say it...... but I'm sure it's there if you look hard enough.

Again ...... "Poker is a game of Situations!"


Agile Beauce said:
Where good TAGs abuse the button, a TAGfish allows himself to be abused by the button."

Yep, this has been known to happen to me too. Do you only play when you are on the button? What ranges do you play when in the other positions? I have been experimenting with the info I have learned, but have been failing miserably. What hands do you play on the button (I know some will say any hand), but when do you go strong with nothing? It is an easy decision if it has been folded around to you and both blinds are short stacked. It is also easy if you have 72 and there is an all in caller ahead of you. But I have trouble with the gray area in between the extremes, trying to figure out if I should fold or represent a strong hand when I'm on the button.

If you are still having trouble Pre-Flop, then your holes post flop might be more sever than first thought of.

And for that reason I will only say, "Poker is a game of Situations!"


Agile Beauce said:
"He bleeds all his money trying to hit that hand and then when he does hit, he never makes that money back."
"A TAGfish plays his own cards too often and the situation and his opponents not nearly enough."

This happens sometimes, but I am getting a little better. I still don't consider EVERY hand my opponent can have. Tonight I had KK and the board was Q9QJK. I figured I had the nuts with Kings Full. I put my opponent on trip Queens, a straight, or maybe Queens full. Unfortunately, my opponent had QQ and hit quads. Twice today I have been beaten like this by the single possible hand that can beat my hand (both times beaten by quads when I had a FH). How do you know when your "monster" hand is really good enough?

This is EXACTLY why you have to be a thinking player! First of all, you have only put the end result. But you didn't include any of the information before that. You MUST consider ALL actions that make up the situation. Pre-flop and on.

You will never hear a pro start a story with, "Okay, so I had pocket Kings and lost to a Q9QJK board." He will include the starting positions the take on the players, the raise amounts, and the actions that create the situation on each street.

Again......... "Poker is a game of Situations!"

Agile Beauce said:
"He plays reactive poker instead of proactive poker."

Yep, this is a hard one to correct.

Yes. This can be a HUGE habit to break. And it is still one of my weakest areas...... But I am making an effort to think before I act.

In general you MUST have a plan because, "Poker is a game of Situations!"

Agile Beauce said:
"The answer: concentrate on making the best decision every single time the action is on you and take your time."

There has to be more to it then this. I try to concentrate on making the best decision, but I'm still a TAGfish. There must be more.

It shouldn’t take long to figure out what I am going to say here.........


"Poker is a game of Situations!" And you MUST think
 
R

Ranny

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Total posts
1,349
Awards
5
Chips
4
If I raise 70% of pots am I a Tagfish?

Seriously, its a very good article, well played TAG is profitable but when they loosen up, they do it all wrong. A good LAG player will crucify them.

The step from TAG to LAG is much harder but remember a good LAG player knows when to fold.
 
StormRaven

StormRaven

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Total posts
2,510
Chips
0
Great article - thanks for posting!
Imo - one of the key things to remember is the situational play. Many tag players do have a style that they feel works for them yet fail to mix up their play and style and failing to take full benefits of a current situation or fail to realize the actual situation at hand. Learn to get out of your "comfort zone" and explore other styles of play - but adjust on a situational basis.

Snow has a thread: https://www.cardschat.com/forum/cash-games-11/my-mtt-strategies-161649/ that I would recommend as a read to any of you that have identified with the article posted above. One of the things I love about Snow's article is his advocation for deep thought processes with each and every hand you play.

GL!
 
spiderman637

spiderman637

RIP Buck
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Total posts
1,835
Chips
0
yeah, i agree. One of the main tools of success at poker is to keep changing your style of play from time to time, and other important tool is patience{its my fav weapon}.And the tag fishes really lack this both...
Very nice post by the way buddy. Thanks.
 
Sysvr4

Sysvr4

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Total posts
277
Chips
0
For the longest time I was guilty of #1 and #4. #4 I think I've corrected, and I'm working on #1 (though, sadly, I don't always get it right). Regarding implied odds, I find people who don't really understand how to calculate it justifying a call because of "implied". I mean, it works for me, because it generally means they're making a -EV call, but it's kind of entertaining to hear.
 
hojediade

hojediade

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Total posts
144
Chips
0
Great resource.
This led me to think that there is no perfect players, and most of them will make mistakes, no matter what their level of play, cause afterall, poker is a game where you want to push your opponents to do mistakes.
I know i have work to do on my own play and will try to improve my game as everyone at CC. And reading articles is the best way for me to do so.
So, thank's again for the infos.
:)
 
L

luckforsome

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Total posts
237
Chips
0
I read this and thought "am i being stalked at the poker table"..i kinda do most of these at seperate times.will defo read this again and try evaluate it next time im in game..good thread, good rading,..thanks
 
Stu_Ungar

Stu_Ungar

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 14, 2008
Total posts
6,236
Chips
0
You will never, ever, ever be able to put Villain on quads when you're holding the nut full house. Don't bother trying, it happens too infrequently to have a long term neg impact on your winrate, and folding the nut full house on the suspicion Villain has quads will have a tremendous neg impact on your winrate (Villain will almost always show up w a worse hand than the nut fh).Your monster hand is good enough when you believe it to likely be better than the hand Villain is holding. Did you see the vid of the royal flush beating quad A's in the WSOP? The guy w quad A's did not make a mistake shoving there, it's tremendously unlikely that his hand is second best (man, did I feel his pain)- and the worst that his hand could possibly be is second best - the second nuts is almost always a monster worth pushing, esp if you see likely third and fourth best hands that will call.

This is a good point. There are certain hands that you just cannot get away from. Your opponent would have to basically have zero agression without the absolute nuts, which is unlikely.

You do need to make good folds to be good at poker, but making folds of that magnitude would be a leak because you would be very bluffable, and over-cautions, in essence you would lose far more than you would win by folding really big hands because there is a slightly bigger hand possible.
 
T

testreet

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Total posts
88
Chips
0
I think 2, 3, and 6 sorta describe me. I need to work on that
 
S

stu

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Total posts
7
Chips
0
Yeah, This is a fantastic post. I think when i am doing multitabling like 8-10 i can slip into that auto-mode and also i never quit and give up if things just arnt going my way on that day. Really has opened my eyes thanks for that.
 
aesopdurasic

aesopdurasic

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Total posts
277
Chips
0
Wow great post. well i know now i am a fish. I have really been recently focusing on my post flop play. I think the river play is always tough for me. When i fire twice and get called i always almost never really know where im at in the hand and i think thats why i have such a huge leak in river play. again thanks for the great article info.
 
Top