Originally Posted by vinylspiros
great response man.i really enjoyed reading it. thats exactly how i see it and agree. "IF" at some point someone decides to make a risky move and it actually works out for them,it could be the difference it makes that will send someones poker carreer and life into a complete total direction. so there is two ways to go. the safe way that is long and boring but will probably get you where you want o go and then theres the fast way that is full of risk and danger but is also ten times faster and will get you there alot quicker than everyone else(assuming u dont get killed/go busto on the way). i preffer the safe way but am thinking about maybe trying out my luck in the 200NL at some point if im feeling lucky and am on some kind of good roll.
I hope you didnt gloss over the small mention I made that like 95% of people who take that fast approach go broke. Its a big thing to consider. If you do take that approach there is no going back. Your not going to end up playing and winning 500 or 1k and then go back to 50nl, same if you lose 1 bi, your going to stick the rest in and hope.
Again, if you dont care for 600 and can reload and go back to like 25nl then take the shot but if its your whole poker roll, i'd advise against it.
Anyway, Im not here to convince you of either way, all I can do is say GL. Im pretty sure youve made up your mind from before you posted this thread though.