Since I've posted this -- no thanks to the overwhelming response, gang
-- I've heard a few theories:
1) The bigger the pool, the more the fish. With so many more people at sites like Starts and Full Tilt, it means there many more bad players out there.
2) The sites with the most traffic have the most professional multi-tablers grinding every stake. Smaller networks (like Merge and Bodog) are full of fish because anybody that's good enough to multi-table has to go elswhere.
3) The lack of HUDs at sites (like Bodog among other) actually make people play tighter -- not better, but tighter, so there are more nits at the low stakes.
Anyone like these theories?
p.s. Divebitch: South-ish Philly -- south of grad hosp.