SNG, FT vs. Stars

I know this has been a topic before, but I used to play 9-man SNG's on Full Tilt, but have been on Stars for around 6 months now...I'm finding that there seem to be many more SNG regs on Stars, and generally, the play is better. Does anyone else find this? Should I consider moving and playing back on FT again?

stars is alot better...also it takes alot shorter to complete a tourny..also the payouts are better

1. What makes the SNGs better?
2. Why do they take less time on Stars?
3. Are you referring to MTTs?

I like to play NLH at Tilt and RAZZ/HORSE/Studhl at pokerstars. The limit sit and go games at Tilt seem to last about 9-11 minutes longer then at Stars and thats with 8p table. Pretty big difference in the long run. Frankly the lower limits i play i find it also a little softer at Stars.

to me I cant play sngs at FT cus of the blind structure...but I do know what you're talking about with the regs.

First of all if you're playing at the limits you usually play at, they are all fish, regulars, but fish

Stars has better everything imo...cash, mtts, and sngs...youre a good player, dont worry about regs untill 50$+ sngs...trust me I got killed playing the 36-76$ 6 max (well I think I came out even or a little ahead but it was way harder than 10$ ones thats for sure)

Alright, maybe I'll stick to Stars then...now that you mention it KC, I do remember the structure of the Tilt SNGs being awful...first time I anted up on Stars I had no idea what was happening. Alright, well...guess it's time to get better and stick to what I'm doing.

Having played both, I have had greater success at Full Tilt. However, I generally play the low-stakes non turbo, as like everyone has said, the Turbo full tilt blind structure is brutal and it turns into a shove fest sometimes with 5 players left.