Sammy. Thanks for the input, I will definately give that a try. The only problem is that when you enter a table, it shows your bankroll and asks how much you want to take the to table, so it is difficult to not at the least acknowledge it's existence. But it is definatly worth a shot.
I have spent a lot of time reading books to improve my game, and I think the part on bankroll management has gotten into my head and is messing with me a little bit. I have invested enough to give me plenty of buy ins to prevent utter distruction after a losing session, and this has allowed me to play with much less stress, and the game is coming comfortably now instead of trying to force it. This problem only arises at the end of my timed sessions, and I think a lot of it has to do with books that I have read regarding maximizing the profits from your winning sessions.
Prior to reading Super System 2 and Online Ace, I had considered putting a cap on the ammount that I win, and once I hit that number, walking away from the table. I considered this because I have noticed that I play better when I am even or behind than when I am well ahead. But I have tried playing times sessions versus capped sessions, and this is the problem that I have run into.
What is your feedback regarding timed sessions versus capped sessions?
In my opinion, I think capped sessions might be the best option for me at this time due to this particular problem. The reason being is that I don't have to quit, but change tables and move to a table where I am back at even and playing solid poker instead of playing comfortable and loose.
I don't know, maybe I just need to back away for a week or 2 and get this issue out of my head.