Which poker room has most lucrative rakes at SNG micro/low limits?

alienat3d

alienat3d

easy-going alien grinder
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Total posts
2,954
Awards
14
Chips
50
The question to SNG regulars. And it's already in topic, don't need to repeat it. :)
In addition i want say, that for me most interesting are SNGs 9 or 10max with relative slow structure (8mins+), 3 places in prize and without short stacks. A normal classic full table SNGs.
What do you think are there some poker rooms who has better rakes for those kind of game?
 
P

ParagonPoker

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Total posts
52
Chips
0
I would honestly say pokerstars have one of the most beatable long term low stakes SnGs. Players are often very poor and if you have a big enough bankroll to deal with variance you should be fine.
 
alienat3d

alienat3d

easy-going alien grinder
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Total posts
2,954
Awards
14
Chips
50
Here i made kind of comparison of different poker rooms for their SNG structure and rakes. Interesting thing, but poker stars have longest blind lvl during 10 minutes, but rake isn't that lucrative as some others. Check my list out.
I looked up only $1 or close to it buy-ins and tried to find slowest SNG i could.
The worst rake of all seems to be amazingly at my favourite
888 poker: $1 Buy-in ($0.15 Rake = 15%) [8 min blinds] {1500 Stack};
Poker Stars: $1,5 Buy-in ($0.21 Rake = 14%) [10 min blinds] {1500 Stack};
Most cheapest of rooms i checked about rake amounts were tigergaming & partypoker.
tigergaming: $1.10 Buy-in ($0.10 Rake = 11%) [8 min blinds] {1500 Stack}; (here need to add, that you won't get any club points for playing this kind of limit)
partypoker: $1.10 Buy-in ($0.10 Rake = 11%) [8 min blinds] {2000 Stack};
In ipoker network i have checked 3 rooms William Hill, NetBet, bet-at-home, and as it seems SNGs there totally the same. They have no slow SNGs, it's amazing. The only 9-handed SNG is Turbo and blinds are raising every 4 minutes. Horrible to me. Rake is €0.14 for €1 Buy-in and it's 14%. Although you gain club points for playing like everywhere except tigergaming.
I also checked PKR, but they have removed all SNGs except 6-handed one, crazy! I guess i'm not going come back there soon.
Seems like partypoker have won that comparison, although i think 10 minutes blind raise at Poker Stars is much better, gives more advantage to skills and less to luck, but 11% rake looks really better than 14%.
I hope this information helped someone too. If you want me to check other limits or kind of games, i could do that too, just ask. ;)
 
sergik1992

sergik1992

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Total posts
1,526
Awards
15
Chips
0
Thank you for info! It`s useful thread particularly for me)
 
I

ianleel

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
May 5, 2007
Total posts
1,791
Awards
16
CA
Chips
78
great information for sit and go I would play in higher stakes
 
WeenieSVK

WeenieSVK

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Total posts
843
Chips
0
Here i made kind of comparison of different poker rooms for their SNG structure and rakes. Interesting thing, but Poker Stars have longest blind lvl during 10 minutes, but rake isn't that lucrative as some others. Check my list out.
I looked up only $1 or close to it buy-ins and tried to find slowest SNG i could.
The worst rake of all seems to be amazingly at my favourite
888 poker: $1 Buy-in ($0.15 Rake = 15%) [8 min blinds] {1500 Stack};
Poker Stars: $1,5 Buy-in ($0.21 Rake = 14%) [10 min blinds] {1500 Stack};
Most cheapest of rooms i checked about rake amounts were tigergaming & partypoker.
tigergaming: $1.10 Buy-in ($0.10 Rake = 11%) [8 min blinds] {1500 Stack}; (here need to add, that you won't get any club points for playing this kind of limit)
partypoker: $1.10 Buy-in ($0.10 Rake = 11%) [8 min blinds] {2000 Stack};
In ipoker network i have checked 3 rooms William Hill, NetBet, bet-at-home, and as it seems SNGs there totally the same. They have no slow SNGs, it's amazing. The only 9-handed SNG is Turbo and blinds are raising every 4 minutes. Horrible to me. Rake is €0.14 for €1 Buy-in and it's 14%. Although you gain club points for playing like everywhere except tigergaming.
I also checked PKR, but they have removed all SNGs except 6-handed one, crazy! I guess i'm not going come back there soon.
Seems like partypoker have won that comparison, although i think 10 minutes blind raise at Poker Stars is much better, gives more advantage to skills and less to luck, but 11% rake looks really better than 14%.
I hope this information helped someone too. If you want me to check other limits or kind of games, i could do that too, just ask. ;)

You made bad calculation on partypoker and tigergaming. 0.10 rake from 1.10 buyin is 9%, not 11%. You also have to count with rewards system (rakeback) on each pokersite and add that to calculation.

But nice from you that you checked all that info and provided us with that. Very helpful.:)
 
alienat3d

alienat3d

easy-going alien grinder
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Total posts
2,954
Awards
14
Chips
50
You made bad calculation on partypoker and tigergaming. 0.10 rake from 1.10 buyin is 9%, not 11%. You also have to count with rewards system (rakeback) on each pokersite and add that to calculation.

But nice from you that you checked all that info and provided us with that. Very helpful.:)

Oops, my bad, thanks that you notice that. It even cheaper, than i thought.
And yes, you right you get something back from points that you earn. (Unfortunately i'm not that lucky to have real rakeback.) But such things are a little bit harder to calculate. Well yeah every poker room has it's own fish hooks. 888 provides pretty cool club lvl system, that is not be zeroed at the end of month, which let you play some daily, weekly and monthly freerolls. william hill let you take part in a lotto daily and ipoker missions as well. Partypoker has missions too and points to cash exchange and so on and so on. So of course this topic is way more deeper, than just comparing rake, but i thought it's still a good point to start off.
I'm glad that you found it helpful. Cheers!
 
D

doom

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Total posts
570
Awards
1
RS
Chips
87
i know that mpn network have only 6 max but come on 1e 10cents fee for 10 min and 1,02e and 8 cents fee for 6 min is the best you can get plus 30 rb plus leaderboard you can get in easy
 
A

Am887

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 20, 2017
Total posts
13
Chips
0
I would honestly say pokerstars have one of the most beatable long term low stakes SnGs. Players are often very poor and if you have a big enough bankroll to deal with variance you should be fine.



Hi Guys .
It's my first time to answer, forgive me some mistakes if there are any.

Was the question not about the rakeback system? Beatable games you can find everywhere, but for rakeback I would play on PartyPoker. Stars got NO rakeback!! The most variance comes with the most recreational players. And guess where are the most recreational player... on Stars . I'm completely agree, when you say, stars has the absolutely best offers! Definitely! On demand sng format! 180 entrants. 45 entrants. Hyper /Turbo.... what you want and when you want it! Awsome! They have no opponents ! But there's nothing for regulars in SNG area.

So long text, short sense :

PartyPoker or ACR:D
 
M

mrbond8844

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 25, 2016
Total posts
250
Chips
0
888 has the best sub sats if that's what you're looking for
 
freerollhound

freerollhound

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Total posts
26
Chips
0
The question to SNG regulars. And it's already in topic, don't need to repeat it. :)
In addition i want say, that for me most interesting are SNGs 9 or 10max with relative slow structure (8mins+), 3 places in prize and without short stacks. A normal classic full table SNGs.
What do you think are there some poker rooms who has better rakes for those kind of game?
nolimit coin poker is rake-free on cash and SGs and charge tourneys and one day a flat sub fee. They give you crypto
 
Top