PartyPoker or PokerStars?

Hey. Two online rooms are currently competing in the online and offline poker market, which offer their players the best in poker and gambling. And which room is the best for you at the moment? And in which room did you win the most money? You can be guided by such criteria as: rake / rakeback size, software, support service, player field strength, ease of depositing and withdrawing funds, promotions and bonuses for players, etc.

pokerstars is the sexy pick,great games,graphics,,,but i make way more at Party. $$$

Hello! I play PokerStars and I really like the client that I installed on my tablet, excellent graphics and stable communication, the help desk works well. I tried to play in other rooms (for ethical reasons I won’t write their name) and it’s from -for graphics refused to play them.

I like to use my HUD. So as long as I can find good games on sites, which allow it, I am not to interested in those sites, which dont. The major HUD allowing sites today are:

* PokerStars
* 888 Poker
* Americas Cardroom

Obviously if you are not a HUD-user, and dont want to become one, you might lean more towards those sites, where other players can not legally use them either, including:

* partypoker
* GG Poker
* Run it Once

You can be guided by such criteria as: rake / rakeback size ...

Click to expand...

I'm playing on both sites. I'm not sure about which one has the better rakeback. On Party you get $5 for each 25 points that you make (lowest level beginning). 25 points aren't to difficult to make. You'll get your rakeback on a weekly base. The reward system on Stars seems to be less profitable. But maybe someone can compare this - especially from the point of view of "new players", which doesn't climb up in the level?

fundiver199 said:

I like to use my HUD. So as long as I can find good games on sites, which allow it, I am not to interested in those sites, which dont. The major HUD allowing sites today are:

* PokerStars
* 888 Poker
* Americas Cardroom

Obviously if you are not a HUD-user, and dont want to become one, you might lean more towards those sites, where other players can not legally use them either, including:

* PartyPoker
* GG Poker
* Run it Once

Click to expand...

I have been playing Partypoker for a month without HUD, and nothing bad happened.

Sergei 9417 said:

Hello! I play PokerStars and I really like the client that I installed on my tablet, excellent graphics and stable communication, the help desk works well. I tried to play in other rooms (for ethical reasons I won’t write their name) and it’s from -for graphics refused to play them.

Click to expand...

The software on the Party is still "dank." I agree that the Stars are the leaders. Although the latest graphics update did not like.

Pokerstars. Because it is pokerstars, there is nothing more to say. Partypoker is a software that was born to compete against Pokerstars, however they will always give you pokerstars before partypoker

fa1920 said:

Pokerstars. Because it is pokerstars, there is nothing more to say. Partypoker is a software that was born to compete against Pokerstars, however they will always give you pokerstars before partypoker

Click to expand...

Yeah but partypoker existed before pokerstars and was the largest poker room before them
I have no opinion as to either because living in the land of the free means I can't play in either

In my country, party poker is illegal and bwin-sportingbet which are the greek edition of partypoker, they dont accept my files for identification. So I dont have the necessary information to decide between the 2 companies. I think that pokerstars has better graphics and design but party poker has more value and more bonuses and rakeback!

throughstruggle said:

I have been playing Partypoker for a month without HUD, and nothing bad happened.

Click to expand...

Not saying it will. Just saying that I like to use my HUD, and therefore there is little incentive for me to play on sites, that does not allow it. They would have to offer something else then like softer games, and currently I just dont think, that is the case

Pokerstars for me currently is shit as hell last time when i played in few hours i lose more than 20 hands in a row going all in. After that i quit playing PS. In PartyPoker never happens such a sick situations, and for me in every aspect PP is better than PS

A Pokerstars client is actually much better than a partypoker client. The game modes are also much better at pokerstars, (unless you like deepstack tournaments). The quality of the player base alone is much lower at party poker.

I think that PartyPoker has more interesting promotions than PS.

Partypoker is better for promotions, freerolls and customer support. The main drawback is the software is unreliable and glitches, and is incompatible with many HUDS/Trackers. This is a shame because they would be way better than Pokerstars if they got an awesome client going IMO

I've always found the play is far too slow at party poker. I get bored very quickly. And if they are running a big tournament there is a good chance that the software will crash. I was a member of one of their forums and there have been suggestions that the software crashed for some countries but not others, meaning unfair advantage. This has been going on for a few years now. Party used to be a big player but they lost a lot of traffic and I don't see that improving.

kamciono5 said:

Pokerstars for me currently is shit as hell last time when i played in few hours i lose more than 20 hands in a row going all in. After that i quit playing PS. In PartyPoker never happens such a sick situations, and for me in every aspect PP is better than PS

Click to expand...

And now I decided to play at the Party. It became simply impossible to play the Stars for the reason that you indicated.

Iryna Stryzheuskaya said:

I think that PartyPoker has more interesting promotions than PS.

Click to expand...

I think that this will be an incentive for the Stars to come up with something more interesting than now.

throughstruggle said:

I think that this will be an incentive for the Stars to come up with something more interesting than now.

Click to expand...

If this happens, I will be glad.

There is a long since I played at Party Poker for the last time, But I have seen a lot of complaining about crashes and lost connections in their Facebook page.
I used to like to play there, but I don't have time to play in more than one room.
I don't have issues with Pokerstars.

Pokerstars with its latest graphics and speed will remain for me only for CC Freerolls!
I prefer PP through my BWIN skin 100 times much more :top:

Dejange said:

Pokerstars with its latest graphics and speed will remain for me only for CC Freerolls!
I prefer PP through my BWIN skin 100 times much more :top:

Click to expand...

I think many were dissatisfied with the new design and graphics of the Stars, so perhaps they will take this into account and change something. For example, I left my dissatisfaction with the support service)

I a fam of pokerstars personnaly, i love the marketing Campaign of this website and the table are pretty sweat.

Both are good, but bigger fields on Stars , I prefer Party for tournaments up to 2000 players.