Ya lets get back on track people. Basically my point is that I really believe that PokerStars has holes in their business model, and that there's opportunities for the competition to take stabs at their customer base.
"What 3 sites are better than stars"
So please tell me, which 3 are better than Stars and why?
I never said "There are 3 sites better than stars" I said there are at least 3 sites with better customer service. Sheesh, are you guys on the Stars PR payroll? Please don't misquote me.
Again, the point I am making is that people unwitting accept Pokerstars as this great site and this wonderful place to play almost only because "everyone else sucks" which makes me think, well what's going to happen when the US gets opened up eventually? Seems like there's plenty of opportunity for a competitor to attack the weaknesses.
Well duh. It's a VIP program. It's only logical/expected that high volume players are gonna get the most benefits, that's the whole reason it exists.
Well DUH I can understand rewarding high volume players but if the system is:
Site A: Gives 27% rakeback to ALL players, regardless of volume.
Site B: Gives 12-15% rakeback to low-medium volume players.
As a player that fits within that "most" player window which one will I prefer? I'm sure it'd be interesting to calculate to see which makes more to see the poker room perspective:
Amount of Rake Generated by Non-Supernova+ Players vs Amount of Rake Generated by SuperNova+ Players
I don't know the answer to that question, but I do bring the question up for debate.
Anyways that's all i can talk about now, gotta get back to work ...