I've noticed that I can beat the games on 888 & titan/william hill very easily?

I've been grinding on stars for a while.. give or take It's a tough tournament field to beat I have to be taking serious note to the table dynamics to consistantly be making a profit (which is sometimes hard for me to do)

Well I rediscovered 888 poker, titan etc which is where I started playing, I have noticed a Huge Difference in the game standards,

liturally take down pots with weak bets and theirs a very high level of uncontested freebet folding, no one really defends their blinds in the low stakes whether or not they understand the concept I dont know, but this is exciting

Just seems like the way forward for anyone whos been playing regular a few years,
I think this is the same for most sites that aren't widely associated with telivised poker or have a gambling representitive company attached to their sites, (Ladbrokes, william hill, coral, paddypower sky etc etc

IMO stars is no question the hardest site to beat. Its the most aggressive, and obviously the field sizes are HUGE. Way more variance on stars as compared to other sites since players as a whole are more aggressive and you are forced to flip for your trny life way more frequently.

Sites like Titan, 888, and most of the american facing sites are much more passive and therefore easier to accumulate chips with less showdown.

I have a friend who final tables 888 tourneys very often, but i dont like all these crappy software online poker rooms ..

how big is the sample size?

Daniel72 said:

I have a friend who final tables 888 tourneys very often, but i dont like all these crappy software online poker rooms ..

Click to expand...

I find stars to be better because of the huge field size as mentioned. I actually like the 888 software more but tend to avoid it because it's so empty... it takes too much time for a tournament to fill up

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

Daniel72 said:

I have a friend who final tables 888 tourneys very often, but i dont like all these crappy software online poker rooms ..

Click to expand...

Maybe these rooms have no as sophisticated program as PS, but I still like them better than PS. Especially pacific and ipoker network. They have nice lil tournaments. Sometimes I play PS giga-mega tournaments with tens of thousands players, but that's just a hobby. 2 many players there.

I think the worst is boss network programwise. Only a very few things can be changed in the lobby.

That's pretty obvious, most poker professionals have a pokerstars account, while william hill and other ipoker network rooms have soft recreational players who are willing to gamble. It might also be because of the casino games they offer.