Is attaining supernova on stars worth going for over ftp rakeback?
I play on pokerstars
and im currently on pace to achieve supernova vip status. i was just wondering if im better of continuing to play there or if id be better of going for the fulltilt rakeback and ironman stuff there.
the only problem with pokerstars at the moment is ive got my rakeback stored in fpps so its not like money in your bankroll like ftp would be as if you collect points till the end of year you get better value.
is the rakeback higher on ftp or pokerstars with supernova type volume which is the equivalent to about 1 million hands a year at 25nl.