C
champ_mc99
Enthusiast
Silver Level
I've noticed the amount of loose-passives in 2NL are considerably more higher in 2NL.
On 6 different poker tables, I've managed to reel in about 0.5 to 1 buy ins within half an hour on average when it comes to 2NL. On 5NL this could sometimes take an hour which although is more than 2NL it does seem to vary a lot so on overall the amount of profit per hour to me seems less.
When it comes to showdowns, despite being quite tight myself, most players on 5NL don't seem to play anything weaker than a QJ whereas on 2NL you get many showdowns with any suited face card/rags. They're either chasing a flush/straight with bad implied odds or they just don't understand kickers.
I know people say it isn't much of a big difference and 5NL is only slightly harder but on 888poker this doesn't seem to be the case.
On 6 different poker tables, I've managed to reel in about 0.5 to 1 buy ins within half an hour on average when it comes to 2NL. On 5NL this could sometimes take an hour which although is more than 2NL it does seem to vary a lot so on overall the amount of profit per hour to me seems less.
When it comes to showdowns, despite being quite tight myself, most players on 5NL don't seem to play anything weaker than a QJ whereas on 2NL you get many showdowns with any suited face card/rags. They're either chasing a flush/straight with bad implied odds or they just don't understand kickers.
I know people say it isn't much of a big difference and 5NL is only slightly harder but on 888poker this doesn't seem to be the case.