| This is a discussion on PLO: bottom set on a drawy board within the online poker forums, in the Tournament Poker section; This happened to me yesterday in a 10+1 PLO tourney on Felt pokerstars (Merge Network). I got dealt 55xx on BB at 50/100. My stack ... |
| Titan Poker | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
| |||||||

![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| PLO: bottom set on a drawy board This happened to me yesterday in a 10+1 PLO tourney on Felt pokerstars (Merge Network). I got dealt 55xx on BB at 50/100. My stack was about 2.5k, 2 people limp in, SB completes and I check. The board comes AT5 with the two bigger cards being suited. I lead for pot size of 400, get raised by the next player pot to 2000 and I ship. My question is that I have learned that in Omaha that set over set is much more likely, something like 1/10 so would the chance with 3 other players therefore be 3/10? Also with such a shallow stack should I always be jamming? (In cash games I would obv. fold). |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | PLO: bottom set on a drawy board | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| You could easily be behind here to a higher set. Not everyone raises with naked aces (AAxx/AA48 rainbow), I certainly wouldn't. Sorry, but your initial raise was not a good play, especially in early position. No one with a decent flush draw will fold. No one with a JQK will fold - well, maybe. Someone with an A-10 might also stick around. Your stack was not that shallow. This is a check-fold, IMO. Wait for a better spot. You can never be drawing to the nuts here unless you get the case 5 (let's assume no one is drawing to quad 10s or aces). BTW, did the other 2 people in the hand call? You don't mention it, so they folded? Then again, you say "so would the chance with 3 other players therefore be 3/10?", so I'm thinking they did call. So what was the outcome?? Or do you wanna wait? I'm thinking flush draw, and it hit. In a way, 3 people in the hand could mean they are all drawing dead with aces & 10s in their hand, or they have the needed suit in their hands, which makes the flush less likely. On the other hand, if only 1 opponent jams, and the others fold, it's more likely he's got the over set, and you are drawing dead. On a somewhat more insignificant note, it could mean that more of the flush suit is still in the deck. IOW, he might have 2 top pair with redraws to a flush, not good for you. Last edited by Divebitch : 10th March 2010 at 2:15 PM. |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I put him on a range of two pair, big draw and maybe an over set (which he had although it doesn't really matter for the questions). The average stack was close to 4k so I was feeling some pressure to double up, so I decided that I am likely to be flipping - was this assessment correct? And you are right dive, I didn't play this that well. I definitely want to get rid of some of this C-game (which was due to tiredness). Last edited by flint : 10th March 2010 at 2:57 PM. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Okay, let's say villain has that top 2 pair and a flush draw (4 outs AATT, flush a flush draw 9 out. That's 13 x 2. He is slightly ahead of that coin-flip. When you throw in the possibility of an overset, he wins hands down unless you see the case 5, which I would not bet on (or unless you had some backdoor flush draw, which I also wouldn't bet on). Can't say is the assessment is correct unless you can correctly put someone on a hand. He can have nothing but a nut flush draw, who knows. But I take the cautious way out here, as there are many hands that can either beat you outright or can be heavily drawn to to beat you, and this is not a dry flop. |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| re: PLO: bottom set on a drawy board poker Quote:
Geo, where are you from? Looks like China, but...![]() |