| This is a discussion on Is it really a bad call suited connectors all-in in multi-way pot? within the online poker forums, in the Learning Poker section; Hello, I've come across this situation numerous times before and this can be either cash or tournament play so would like your advice. At a ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Is it really a bad call suited connectors all-in in multi-way pot? Hello, I've come across this situation numerous times before and this can be either cash or tournament play so would like your advice. At a full ring table, if you are 100bb deep in either cash or tournament mode is it really a bad call to call shoves if it's a multi-way pot with suited connectors 6-7/8-9/10-J? I've had this happens numerous times and the amount of times I've landed Aces or Kings and had to shove with against other pairs and suited connectors, it's very often a pair is any good in multiway all-in pots. Quite often someone with 2 cards (suited or not) in a multiway pot have so many outs to create such a monster I wonder if it's correct to call with 4+ people entering the pot? I know it isn't the best play in tournament mode early on, but even so sometimes it can be tempting, as daft as it sounds I love being all-in with suited connectors and feel more confident with them winning as opposed to Aces or Kings all in against 4/5 people. Thoughts? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Is it really a bad call suited connectors all-in in multi-way pot? | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| Not a cash game player myself, but in tourny's its not a good idea. If they are all in pre flop and it'll take most of your stack, its a big no. If these people want to gamble, let them, it's only going to increase your tourny equity when they get knocked out. This aplies to SNG's also, you don't need to gamble to win. (The exception is if your super SS with ~1BB, putting your money in with 4 or 5 callers/all-ins is giving you a great price for your suited connectors to get 6 - 7 x the BB by winning). |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Is it really a bad call suited connectors all-in in multi-way pot? poker Quote:
|
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
However, that isn't the case and I was seeing if anyone knew if it was a really bad call to call with pot odds all-in pre flop WHEN there is 4 or 5 all-in preflop. Obviously this doesn't happen all that often, but when it does, is it worth a call? |
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| Calling in these situations 100bb deep would usually be bad. As for a single pair usually not being the best hand multiway, well kinda. equity.jpg (http://www.cardschat.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=36911&d=1300460301) In the situation above AA wins slightly less than 50% of the time BUT when it does win it takes 3 times the amount risked. In other words if stacks are 1000 each: AA - (48.9% * 4000) - (51.1% * 1000)= 1956 - 511 = +1445 chips for every call with AA 76s - (20.3% * 4000) - (79.7% * 1000) = 812 - 797 = +15 chips for every call with 76s I'll take the "single pair". |
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Is it really a bad call suited connectors all-in in multi-way pot? poker I thought the question was about suited connectors not if AA or KK is better than Suited connectors? hahaha I am not a pro and a newbie at understanding the Math of poker but if I am in a tourney and I am 100BB I may call with suited connectors because if there are 3-4 people in the pot you are EV+ and have a chance to knock out a few opponents and increase stack. This would depend on the % of stack I would have at risk, how close we are to the $, chip stack of opponents (are they needing to open shove) and dont forget about implied odds. So really I think it is a situational call that would require more detail to say yes or no either way (So I think it would be safe to say it is a justafiable call at least some times). If it is a cash game I might have to think thoereticly you should take it if you think you are EV+. Unlike tournament you can cash back in if you loose so you want to take as many EV+ bets as you can as in the long run you will be profitable. I cant say my cash game is all that strong as I would likely fold this even if I was EV+. |
|
#13 | ||||
| ||||
| Do you have Poker Stove? If not get it. Play around with your SC and put in the ranges you think you will be against. FWIW, if I am on a full table and 100 BB deep and have 78-TJs ( are we talking effective stacks here?) no way am I CALLING a shove in a multi way pot......... |
|
#15 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Is it really a bad call suited connectors all-in in multi-way pot? poker I have a sincere question,is it ever a good idea multiway or not to call an all in with just 67 because there suited,yeah sure in a tourny if someones down to a couple of blinds i'll call with atc |
|
#16 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#17 | ||||
| ||||
| In tournaments i would not advise that because of the equity. Chips do not represent money and the chips i have are more important than the chips i could get. ? At cash tables it is obvious that on the long run you have to consider the rake. Is the rake bigger or lower than the possible profit you may get on the long run? Strong pro players calculate even the rake they loose because is the difference between profit and loss. Last edited by swingro : 21st March 2011 at 3:54 PM. |
|
#19 | ||||
| ||||
| well, if you're on the big blind and you're 100BB deep, and you have four all ins preflop, and the pot is worth 10 BB and you only have to call 1.5 BB to take it down... Well, it's only an extra 1.5BB You can afford to burn it. Trouble is, at 100BB you don't need to win that pot to make or break your tourney either. Sure you might take it down once in awhile but the times you don't you'll be giving your chips to a worse player than you who may, in turn, give them to a better player than you. No matter what angle you're looking at it's counter productive and -EV Same situation if your stack is 3BB? Hell yeah shove in with all of 'em. You won't get a better spot to gamble for your life and 4x your stack. Still shouldn't be expecting to win it though. |
Number of Posts: 19
Number of Authors: 17