| This is a discussion on Discussion I had during an MTT within the online poker forums, in the Learning Poker section; People were talking about bad beats that they'd had in MTT's and I described a situation where someone shoved with and I called with and ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Discussion I had during an MTT People were talking about bad beats that they'd had in MTT's and I described a situation where someone shoved with and I called with and he hit a 5 on the turn, and I ended up having this conversation:Quote:
|
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Discussion I had during an MTT | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| nope perfectly fine to call, you forgot the times he is shoving weaker Aces on weaker kings, which tend to be more likely than small pairs, i wouldnt consider it a bad beat tho. considering how wide he is shoving tho you should instantly be calling (and calling wider aswell) |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| LOL at bb's analysis. He makes it sound like you were coinflipping against 45s. In an MTT there are a number of spots where coinflipping for your entire stack is probably not advisable. That said, in most cases calling off only 1/3 of your stack with AKs would rarely be a bad play. Definitely not a bad beat though. |
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| After several years of online poker, I can say with full assurance that the amount I've learned about strategy from the chatter that goes on during tournaments is pretty close to zero. The main place to learn and to improve your understanding of strategy elements is away from the table. At the table is where you implement, practice and improve your use of them. |
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Discussion I had during an MTT poker Quote:
Playing so that you depend on the fall of the cards is akin to the Kill Phil type of strategy, which is for situations where you're at a skill disadvantage. In the specific situation in question, barring some highly unusual circumstances, I'd call off a third of my stack with AKs in a flash. |
|
#12 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#14 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
This depends on so many things in tourneys. |
|
#15 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Discussion I had during an MTT poker If by deepstacked you mean you are over 150 BBs deep with someone where the average stack is 30 BBs, then sure. Otherwise, no. (Actually this is debatable because the times you have 300 BBs in that scenario are going to be worth a ton more than the times you fold and stick with 150). But I'm guessing what you consider to be deepstacked to be totally different than that, in which case you would be wrong. And actually, in the above scenario you have even less of a chance of doubling up, and your edge over fish is never going to be very big. The chips you can win are always worth more than the chips you have. |
|
#17 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
As an artificial example, if I'm HU against a far superior player, I'd be more willing to flip for my entire stack because my EV is BE whereas it's negative if I try to play him straight up. The opposite is also true. If the opponent is one I can grind down by winning lots of smaller pots, I'm less keen to flip for a huge pot until such time as I've gained enough of a chip advantage so losing won't cripple me. |
|
#18 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
Number of Posts: 18
Number of Authors: 12