| This is a discussion on 5K hands... Beating the game? Or, running hot? within the online poker forums, in the Learning Poker section; New player question; through 5k hands, playing the FR micros (2nl), with a 15/12-ish style, winning 18 BB/100 - is that enough to safely assume ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| 5K hands... Beating the game? Or, running hot? New player question; through 5k hands, playing the FR micros (2nl), with a 15/12-ish style, winning 18 BB/100 - is that enough to safely assume you're beating the game or is it just running really well? Thanks. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | 5K hands... Beating the game? Or, running hot? | |
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| re: 5K hands... Beating the game? Or, running hot? poker 100k hands for a decent sample size? Seems a bit high to me and I'm not sure I'd wish 100k hands of 2NL on many Actually I'm still at 2NL for cash (I play SNG's mainly) and I am going to review how I'm running at 5k and 10k hands and take it from there. |
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
it was just a joke because if you really are running 18BB/100 that is super hot... and not a sustainable profit |
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| re: 5K hands... Beating the game? Or, running hot? poker If you're playing 15/12 and using PT/HEM then you're definitely a winning player at 2NL, heh. 18bb/100 isn't anywhere near sustainable though, even at that level. 5k hands is such a tiny sample as to be almost meaningless - even after 200k hands you can still quite easily be +/- 3bb/100 away from your 'true' winrate. |
|
#11 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| Similar Threads for: 5K hands... Beating the game? Or, running hot? > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Playing Live $1/$2 NLHE Cash Game - Read Me First | 14 | 23rd March 2012 4:55 AM | Learning Poker | Jillychemung |
Number of Posts: 12
Number of Authors: 9