| This is a discussion on Using the GAP Theory to define your hand. within the online poker forums, in the Golden Archive section; 2nd time writing this post, had a power cut half way though the first one Lets look at a problem hand. Its the mid stages ... |
| | ||||||
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Using the GAP Theory to define your hand. 2nd time writing this post, had a power cut half way though the first one Lets look at a problem hand. Its the mid stages of an MTT, im deepstacked with 10K, the tournament chip leader is in middle position, im on the button, with the blinds at 100/200. I look down to see AJo. Not a bad hand on the button, first instinct is to raise. BUT HOLD ON the chip leader raises 600 pre-flop, the table folds to me. Leaving me the 3 options that we all face in poker. Call/Fold/Raise. In all cases the chip leader is holding AA. Calling : While I dont know my oppoents holding i could speculate here and call for 600 to see if i hit the flop hard. My hand is OK, I was going to raise 600 myself so calling is the same isnt it ? I call, the flop comes A J 2 rainbow, doh.............. we go broke, but how could I have gotten away from it ? Fold : Ok the GAP concept states that we need a stronger hand to call with than raise with, MP could have KQ and im ahead, or AA and im behind, just not worth the risk. Re-raise : Im a loose aggressive player and i want to play here.But I want to define my opponents hand, im deepstacked at this stage, he could have KQ and im ahead, or AA and im behind. If I reraise ONLY a bigger hand is calling AK would call (maybe) here, so would AQ (maybe) and hope to hit the flop. I can make my decision now on the flop much easier if he comes out betting on the flop, unfraid of my pre-flop reraise, defining his possible holdings much better. But wait, what if he re-raises again ? Then i KNOW, with an accurate degree of certainty that im facing a monster hand, and i can safely fold, leaving me with 8K behind, still deepstacked. I raise 1,200 more, the chip leader shoves, I fold easy decision, Im still in the game, didnt make the 2nd best hand and got away relatively cheaply. The re-raise was used to great effect there, we tested the chip leader and got our answer, we used the fact that only a better hand than ours is raising, and the specluative hands that most strong players raise with will usually fold. Hope this makes sense, btw 2K posts now Edit: I have a present for ye all, check the gallery. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Using the GAP Theory to define your hand. | |
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Using the GAP Theory to define your hand. poker Good post TB. I agree; raise early while you've still got a chance to dump it should you feel your behind, and you don't get caught with a falsely nice flop like AJx Then again Chip leader could dick around and smooth call your raise and trap you on a 'good' flop for you...if he's feeling risky. Just a thought... @pic: ahhh yeh drunk buggers Good to match faces to you guys... |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| As the chip leader has only raised the usual 3x the BB you could also consider that he may be trying to nick the pot and so a re-raise should indeed test him out. Although AJ = urgh, not a nice hand in many of times - with this i would have to consider just how he has been playing previously. |
Number of Posts: 12
Number of Authors: 8