| This is a discussion on Worst Poker Book Written within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; What do you think is the worst poker book written? It seems, with the Poker boom in 2003 a lot of books have been written. ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Worst Poker Book Written What do you think is the worst poker book written? It seems, with the Poker boom in 2003 a lot of books have been written. Some of them written just to capitalize on the poker crazy. I remember looking through Doyle Brunson's on on-line poker at the local bookstore a few years ago,Online Poker: Your Guide to Playing Online Poker Safely & Winning Money. It is one of the worst pokers I have seen. The reveiws on Amazon tell the story. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Worst Poker Book Written | |
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| Phil Helmuth's hands down. The best part of it is the filler pages where he explains the rules and most basic of basics of every kind of poker game there is. |
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| Negreneu's book is pretty bad too. He put his name on it to sell it, and 80% of it is written by other people. The section on Deceptive Play, by David Williams, is just a bunch of unrelated anecdotes on different deceptive plays he made. Evidently nobody told Williams that the point of writing a book is supposed to be to make generalizations and conclusions based on your experience. Glad the library was the one who wasted their money on that one. |
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#13 | ||||
| ||||
| The mammoth book of poker comes to mind. Its probably not the worst poker book ever written but i hated it with a fire vengence . Hate the writing style, the bleached ink, the badly expalained examples,the simply wrong math and the fact that the authour "explains" in the intro that poker is 99% luck and 1% skill with out ever explaining what luck is. + It isnt even written by a poker player but a bridge player :S |
|
#14 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Worst Poker Book Written It wasn't a terrible book, but it was quite a disappointment after reading his first one. I'm talking about Phil Gordon's Little Blue Book. His Little Green Book was awesome, but the Little Blue Book was more about him trying to be clever and making fun of his opponents. He should stick to teaching poker and stop with the wanna-be comedian stuff. |
|
#18 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#20 | ||||
| ||||
| Don't know of a truly *bad* one, but I was disappointed in Negraneau's. One that I wish every poker player would read is Barry Greenstein's Ace on the River. Has pretty much 0 to do with how to play, but lots to do with how to act. I have pretty much any poker book written, but the one(s) I refer to before a big tournament are The Zen/Tao books. (Despite disagreeing with it *theologically* ) |
|
#24 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
You know...now that I think about it, I can't think of a single thing off the top of my head that *any* of these books actually taught me. I'm sure I *must've* learned something, right? I just can't think of it. Maybe it's because I'd already been playing for 40 years before I ever read one. Wait...I just thought of one. And, sadly, PH is involved. Read em' and Reap. But that has nothing to do with strategy, just tells. |
|
#25 | ||||
| ||||
| Beyond Tells by James McKenna Texas Hold’em On the Net by David Bradshaw Texas Hold’em Odds by Catalin Barboianu What No One Else is Saying about Online Poker by Carl Varrone The Mathematics of Poker by William Chen and Jerrod Ankenman |
|
#26 | ||||
| ||||
| Holdem Poker for Advanced Players I think is the worst book written that I read it. I wonder if Sklansky and Malmuth weren't drunk while they wrote that book. Theory of Poker. I think a lot of it contains useless informations and is a big waste of time to read it. It's also very difficult to read. I read many books but TOP it's impossible to read. It's so boring and so bad written. I only read a few chapters from TOP but I feel that I don't really need to read it b/c there are a lot of informations that can't be put in practice. The informations that are useful from that book can be found on other books that are better written. What I find surprising is that NLHTP, another Sklansky book, isn't that difficult to read as TOP. A lot of informations from NLHTP are also useless informations (many math that you don't need it), but it's more easier to read than TOP. Last edited by str8 : 2nd July 2009 at 5:54 PM. |
|
#27 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Yep. That book works great for insomnia. |
|
#28 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Worst Poker Book Written Quote:
|
|
#29 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
That is by far the worst thing ever written. It makes me want to support book burning! Anyone that disagrees either hasn't read it (and shouldn't bother) and/or hasn't seen AG's in depth review. I'm one of the unlucky ones that did read it and I wanted to gouge my eyes out!!! |
|
#30 | ||||
| ||||
| I picked up Phil Hellmuth's Texas Hold'em a while ago and it has got to be the worst one I have read. I have not read that many, so not a fair sample set to really critique, but it is an awful read. Just chapter after chapter of him talking about how great he is! |
|
#31 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#32 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I have D's book (all of them actually) and sure I was disappointed with this one but it is far from being the 'worst'. Daniel's section on SmallBall is actually quite good but the majority of the rest of the book is a waste of paper. I wish he'd even written more hand histories of his play, along with his thought processes throughout. You want to see a far worse book??... Check out Amarillo Slim's Book. It is pure rubbish (got it for 25cents at a garage sale). |
|
#33 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I lent out my Helmuth books (I never lend out poker books, lol) and I haven't gotten them back now for over a year.... but am not disappointed one bit. I guess I lent them to a 'jackal'.... |
|
#34 | ||||
| ||||
| "Neocheating - the Unbeatable Weapon". HUGE load of crap. Maybe 2 useful paragraphs about spotting some already well-known shuffle cheat methods. Also Phil Hellmuth's random bits in Joe Navarro's book on tells. It was obvious filler and an attempt to justify putting his name on the cover. Yes Phil, we all know how great you are. Enough already! |
|
#35 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Worst Poker Book Written I actually liked Power Hold Em by Negreanu. *shrug* Maybe cause I've only read that and Super/System, which I will say I was very disappointed in. Maybe I liked Negreanu's book cause I found the Small Ball chapter to be very helpful. Either way, definitely going to be picking up some Harrington on Hold Em books for sure! |
| Similar Threads for: Worst Poker Book Written > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Beginner wanting to start a poker career? | 57 | 1st May 2012 1:37 PM | Learning Poker | R1ace |
Number of Posts: 72
Number of Authors: 47