| This is a discussion on Why PLO Heads-up? within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; Hey People, Is there any reason that a lot of the big time pros these days like to play PLO HU online? Is it just ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Why PLO Heads-up? Hey People, Is there any reason that a lot of the big time pros these days like to play PLO HU online? Is it just because they're bored of NLHE? Or are there other reasons, like... Does PLO offer less variance heads-up game since one player will have something more often whereas in NLHE HU a player will rarely have anything? (I'm aware that PLO FR/SH is a pretty high variance game, but I'm thinking PLO HU might actually offer less variance?) I'm thinking about getting into heads-up, not sure if I should dive straight into PLO though... Would like to know what people think about this... |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Why PLO Heads-up? | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| Mostly I think it's because they think they have a bigger edge in PLO and they stand a chance of convincing people whose main game is NLHE to play. There are a lot of very good HU NLHE players around these days. A lot of those players are willing to play PLO because it's not that different from their main game, but they're nowhere near as good at it. Isildur1 was probably a good example: seeminly strong NLHE game, weaker in PLO. I think there were even some high stakes regs (Antonius maybe?) that refused to play him in anything other than PLO so they could keep their perceived edge. Another reason is probably that PLO tends to play higher than NLHE, as in at the same blind levels PLO will often generate bigger average pots. And to round it off, quite a few European players probably grew up with PLO as their main game so it seems natural they'll keep playing it. |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| I find that PLO is much more of an 'action' game than NLHE. There are far more opportunities to get in with draws, so you may have 4 players all drawing to what they perceive to be the nuts. With the HU its a similar story - lots more action but higher variance. Not so much of a grind though. If I was a Full Tilt Red Pro on 100% rakeback, I'd be slamming the PLO too. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| Similar Threads for: Why PLO Heads-up? > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Rule of 4 and 2/Pot odds? | 13 | 2nd May 2012 3:25 AM | Learning Poker | Hingo |
| Beginning PLO, Some Very Basic Ideas and Thoughts | 41 | 6th February 2012 3:49 AM | Learning Poker | Marginal |
| NLH or PLO Heads Up | 2 | 12th February 2011 6:07 PM | Cash Games | LizaBuv |
| That's debatable: NLHE v PLO | 9 | 10th February 2011 9:09 PM | General Poker | OzExorcist |
| Best heads up online PLO and NLH players? | 1 | 16th January 2011 6:47 PM | General Poker | crabby4 |
Number of Posts: 7
Number of Authors: 7