Poker Forum - Register
Learn to win at online poker at US Poker Sites with our free full tilt poker referral code. Play the best poker online with a pokerstars marketing code that will get you free money for online poker games at your favourite site.
Titan Poker Party Poker Bodog Pacific Poker
Go Back   Poker Forum > Poker Message Boards > General Poker
Search
SEARCH THE ONLINE POKER FORUMS  

Online Poker Forum
Reply
  Poker - why i hate jamie gold
 
  #1  
12-07-2007, 5:29 PM
komargo
New Member
 
Plays at: Full Tilt Po
Likes: holdem
Posts: 14
why i hate jamie gold

Jamie gold is arrogant and not very good at poker. He just gets lucky and thinks he is great when in reality he sucks. you should just watch him on High Stakes Poker, where he gets CRUSHED by doyle brunson
 

PokerStarsPokerStars is amongst the best poker sites online that accepts US players. Use PokerStars marketing code CARDSCHAT for an exclusive $75 bonus.

Full Tilt PokerFull Tilt Poker accepts US players. Use Full Tilt Poker referral code CARDSCHAT for a $600 bonus and to play online poker with the pro's.

  #2  
12-07-2007, 6:11 PM
Wolfpack43ACC
CardsChat Regular
 
Location: Midlothian, VA
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: NL Hold'em
Posts: 367
he's still pretty rich
  #3  
12-07-2007, 10:05 PM
stormswa
Banned
 
Location: Earth
Plays at: full tilt
Likes: all of them
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by komargo
Jamie gold is arrogant and not very good at poker. He just gets lucky and thinks he is great when in reality he sucks. you should just watch him on High Stakes Poker, where he gets CRUSHED by doyle brunson

lol yep because you know him enough to make a judgement like this about him right?
  #4  
12-07-2007, 10:10 PM
roundcat
Aspiring poker degenerate
 
Location: On the windowsill
Likes: NLHE, O8
Posts: 1,477
He is rather unpalatable. As for his play, he's probably decent but not great, and he got incredibly lucky in last year's Main Event, hitting every flop. Arrogant? Yes. Not a smart move to play on High Stakes Poker with players of that caliber, but hey, it's his money.
  #5  
12-07-2007, 10:13 PM
brown110
Advanced Member
 
Plays at: bodog
Likes: holdem
Posts: 146
Hell... he could play high stakes poker even if he hadnt won the main event. Didnt he make millions as the agent for all the people on the sopranos?
  #6  
12-07-2007, 10:13 PM
Broke31
Amateur Member
 
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: Holdem
Posts: 68
i really cant stand him he was very lucky and cocky but u have to have skill to win the main event.
  #7  
12-07-2007, 10:18 PM
muddawgg
Advanced Member
 
Location: south carolina
Plays at: full tilt
Likes: holdem
Posts: 187
he has got to be the luckiest person iv'e ever seen
  #8  
12-07-2007, 10:19 PM
arkadiy
CardsChat Elite
 
Location: Memphis
Plays at: FullTilt
Likes: Hold Em
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by komargo
Jamie gold is arrogant and not very good at poker. He just gets lucky and thinks he is great when in reality he sucks. you should just watch him on High Stakes Poker, where he gets CRUSHED by doyle brunson

Is someone jealous because they aren't as rich as him?
  #9  
12-07-2007, 10:21 PM
skoldpadda
Caveman Eye Surgeon
 
Location: Cyberspace
Plays at: PS, Tilt
Likes: CC Razz Guru
Posts: 2,800
You all know that his mom enetered the WSOP Main Event this year and outlasted him, right?

This is NOT a joke.
  #10  
12-07-2007, 10:33 PM
pezjb
Expert Member
 
Location: Rockland, NY
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: NLHE
Posts: 264
Just because he had one hand run through with Doyle, pair of Queens vs broadway, doesn't mean he is a bad player. I believe he got a lot of luck, but that is what takes to win the ME now-a-days. Moneymaker and Raymer are not very good players themselves. Take it Moneymaker, is doing well this year, but he is really not top of the line. Jamie Gold did not hit every flop, he continuely talked his opponents off their hands and bluffed. Not every player can do that.
  #11  
13-07-2007, 12:51 AM
reglardave
CardsChat Elite
 
Location: Illinois
Plays at: pokerstars
Likes: Horse
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pezjb
Just because he had one hand run through with Doyle, pair of Queens vs broadway, doesn't mean he is a bad player. I believe he got a lot of luck, but that is what takes to win the ME now-a-days. Moneymaker and Raymer are not very good players themselves. Take it Moneymaker, is doing well this year, but he is really not top of the line. Jamie Gold did not hit every flop, he continuely talked his opponents off their hands and bluffed. Not every player can do that.
Gotta disagree with u re/ GTreg raymer. The man has game. Moneymaker was a flashinthepan (so far) and I think Gold will turn to be same, but Raymer can definitely play, as can Joe Hachem.
  #12  
13-07-2007, 12:55 AM
joosebuck
Friendly NeighborhoodTRex
 
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Plays at: 911POKER.COM
Likes: strip poker
Posts: 3,917
moneymaker is a lot better than he was in '03.
  #13  
13-07-2007, 1:01 AM
mrrigel
Advanced Member
 
Location: Philadelphia
Plays at: stars
Likes: hold em
Posts: 186
jimi hendrix was arrogant and cocky too.......because he could be. dude won the main event, what do you expect.
  #14  
13-07-2007, 1:03 AM
juiceeQ
Is it hot in here?
 
Location: Jackson, CA
Plays at: Poker Stars
Likes: NL Holdem
Posts: 13,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by pezjb
Moneymaker and Raymer are not very good players themselves.
While I'll agree Moneymaker isn't the best, Raymer is a VERY good player. I think you'll find most of the pros admire and respect him very much.

As for Jamie Gold, meh, the guy is a slime ball, I don't care for him. He does have a way of talking his opponents into making calls. I haven't seen much of him other that the ME last year. He did get extremely lucky more than once.
  #15  
13-07-2007, 1:48 AM
Kenzie 96
Tiltin toward Drunkdom
 
Plays at: pokerstars
Likes: holdem
Posts: 3,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrrigel
jimi hendrix was arrogant and cocky too.......because he could be. dude won the main event, what do you expect.

Didn't even know Hendrix played poker. You sure you aren't mistaking Jimbo for Gabe Kaplin?
  #16  
15-07-2007, 7:39 AM
T-MaQ
Amateur Member
 
Plays at: PS AND FT
Likes: Holdem
Posts: 62
if cocky and lucky gets me 12 mil, where do i sign up?!
  #17  
15-07-2007, 8:48 AM
skoldpadda
Caveman Eye Surgeon
 
Location: Cyberspace
Plays at: PS, Tilt
Likes: CC Razz Guru
Posts: 2,800
LOL about badmouthing Raymer... yet another example of someone on here posting without doing their homework.

After Raymer won the WSOP in 2004, he finished 25th of 5594 the very next year. That is the most impressive consecutive finishes in the WSOP since Chan won back to back and then finished 2nd to Hellmuth.

Come on folks. This is a poker site. Either know the history or do your homework.

Now Jamie Gold, although apparently spewy in the high stakes cash games (rumor is he plays as "Pachelbel" on FTP and is considered a fish and he did not shine on High Stakes Poker IMHO), does have a history of doing fairly well in tournaments before his WSOP win.

Now Moneymaker -- if you've read his autobiography, he does a pretty good job at making himself sound like a douchebag. He has cashed in a few prestigious tournaments in the past couple years though, but not overly impressive.
  #18  
15-07-2007, 11:41 AM
Nexar
Advanced Member
 
Location: Mexico, Tamaulipas
Plays at: bodog, stars
Likes: Ghetto botty
Posts: 138
yeah hes kind of arrogant i hate the part when a flop came down he said "top top", hes opponent went all in then he called and said "top top i ment top pair top kicker why you went all in? hes opponent was like stfu mad at him
  #19  
15-07-2007, 3:39 PM
bodizzl
Junior Member
 
Plays at: full tilt pk
Posts: 35
yo

get over it. hell never win again and you prolly wont win either. ppl are just mad because he developed a style that they couldnt copy. i mean its one thing to read an opp. but if you can get him to tell him your cards. wow if anything the ppl he was layin were idiots
  #20  
15-07-2007, 8:45 PM
WPT2008
New Member
 
Plays at: FT
Likes: HE
Posts: 10
Jamie Gold played a level of poker that got into the "heads" of other players. He manipulated the players, and won pots (and yes some hands he was very extrememly lucky on) Alot of his preflop calls (with raises in front of him) were ultimately donkey calls, however, he flopped the cards, and made his move.

Daniel N. will pay to see almost every flop then try to destroy the rest who are still in the hand once the flop has landed, only difference is, Daniel doesn't sit there and manipulate your play preflop, and then get in your head and sorta tick you off. LOL
  #21  
15-07-2007, 9:06 PM
pokerdog283
Amateur Member
 
Plays at: fulltilt
Likes: holdem
Posts: 52
I agree he is a card magnet
  #22  
16-07-2007, 12:18 AM
aron77
New Member
 
Posts: 4
I agree he is awful and just fell into a hot streak to win the big one. Now that he has money he has a chance to get better but his bracelet was all luck and I was shocked that when he was saying that he was playing well that no one corrected him.
  #23  
16-07-2007, 2:31 PM
Afterlife000
Expert Member
 
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: Hold em
Posts: 220
Yeah i think jamie gold is terrible at poker, he was just getting REALLY lucky.
  #24  
16-07-2007, 9:44 PM
Wolfpack43ACC
CardsChat Regular
 
Location: Midlothian, VA
Plays at: Full Tilt
Likes: NL Hold'em
Posts: 367
I'm still not sold on Greg Raymer and his game. 5 years from now I think we'll be saying Greg who? Yes he had sick back to back results, but when he wins another tournament or makes a final table for that matter let me know.
  #25  
16-07-2007, 11:43 PM
F Paulsson
Monsieur Chateaux
 
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 3,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfpack43ACC
I'm still not sold on Greg Raymer and his game. 5 years from now I think we'll be saying Greg who? Yes he had sick back to back results, but when he wins another tournament or makes a final table for that matter let me know.
He made two final tables at the WSOP this year alone. He's won about a million dollars in various tournaments outside of his WSOP Main Event win.

The post you're looking to make now goes something along the lines of "I stand corrected. I suppose I could have looked these things up for myself, and I regret that I didn't."

I'm sorry if that seems like a snippy answer, but seriously, you could have looked this up yourself instead of giving that job to the rest of us.
  #26  
17-07-2007, 6:40 AM
T-MaQ
Amateur Member
 
Plays at: PS AND FT
Likes: Holdem
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by WPT2008
Jamie Gold played a level of poker that got into the "heads" of other players. He manipulated the players, and won pots (and yes some hands he was very extrememly lucky on) Alot of his preflop calls (with raises in front of him) were ultimately donkey calls, however, he flopped the cards, and made his move.

Daniel N. will pay to see almost every flop then try to destroy the rest who are still in the hand once the flop has landed, only difference is, Daniel doesn't sit there and manipulate your play preflop, and then get in your head and sorta tick you off. LOL
i agree here. he got into people heads and pretty much got what he wanted from them most of the time. of course he was lucky. anybody who wins an event that size with that amount of money at stake needs luck, what player doesn't? he had the sizeable chip stack to take chances as well. he was getting a lot good cards. you can't blame him for that.
  #27  
17-07-2007, 6:54 AM
T-MaQ
Amateur Member
 
Plays at: PS AND FT
Likes: Holdem
Posts: 62
and for him playing on high stakes poker and getting crushed. i haven't seen the episode, but there is a different mindset when you play cash games and tournaments, at least im my opinion and from my experiences
  #28  
17-07-2007, 7:03 AM
imlosinit4u
Junior Member
 
Posts: 40

Jamie Gold was a little lucky.But no one can make it through a field that size without making very many correct decisions.That takes skill and luck.
  #29  
17-07-2007, 7:49 AM
Emperor IX
<--HOTTEST
 
Plays at: Pokerstars
Likes: Hold 'em
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by F Paulsson
He made two final tables at the WSOP this year alone. He's won about a million dollars in various tournaments outside of his WSOP Main Event win.

The post you're looking to make now goes something along the lines of "I stand corrected. I suppose I could have looked these things up for myself, and I regret that I didn't."

I'm sorry if that seems like a snippy answer, but seriously, you could have looked this up yourself instead of giving that job to the rest of us.
Not to mention 14th in this years HORSE event, which was the toughest field, skill wise.
 

« Previous Full Tilt    why play freerolls? Next »

Display Modes
Similar Threads for: why i hate jamie gold
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jamie Gold admits 'his mistake' beardyian General Poker 59 25-08-2008 7:45 PM


Players Only Poker   PokerStars

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Sitemap: General

Copyscape   Poker En Ligne Online Poker Poker Online
All original site contents ©Cardschat.com 2004-2008. Reproduction is prohibited.