| Titan Poker | Party Poker | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||
 |
|
Poker - Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate?
|
|
#1
15-09-2008, 7:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate?
I am being told that playing NL10 is not worth my time because of the rake at ft.
How could NL25 possibly be that much better? |
|
|
|
#2
15-09-2008, 7:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
cuz FT rakes 10% at 10NL and 5% at 25NL
if u wanna play 10NL, dont play at FT |
|
#3
15-09-2008, 7:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
15-09-2008, 7:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
15-09-2008, 7:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have like $350. I'm thinking about just going for 25nl and hoping for the best. I've played 25nl before but quit when i started loosing.
But with a HUD I think I can do decent.... |
|
#6
15-09-2008, 7:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate?
Of course it's more risky being under rolled, but it's certainly possible with average or better luck. I actually started playing NL25 at FT with only $200, I justified it because I had enough $$ at Bodog to consider myself rolled for NL25 when considered in total. I caught some cards early and quickly got to the point were I could feel comfortable at those stakes.
gl |
|
#7
15-09-2008, 7:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 ty sir |
| Similar Threads for: Poker > Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate? | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 10k post: micro stakes full ring guide [long] | ChuckTs | Golden Archive | 57 | 19-11-2008 11:48 PM |
| The up side of higher stakes poker | donkeyboy1989 | General Poker | 16 | 11-10-2007 8:00 AM |
| Quality of players: low stakes vs. high stakes | pokernut | Poker Rooms | 2 | 26-01-2007 8:11 PM |
Full Tilt Poker