| This is a discussion on Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate? within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; I am being told that playing NL10 is not worth my time because of the rake at ft. How could NL25 possibly be that much ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate? I am being told that playing NL10 is not worth my time because of the rake at ft. How could NL25 possibly be that much better? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate? | |
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate? poker Of course it's more risky being under rolled, but it's certainly possible with average or better luck. I actually started playing NL25 at FT with only $200, I justified it because I had enough $$ at Bodog to consider myself rolled for NL25 when considered in total. I caught some cards early and quickly got to the point were I could feel comfortable at those stakes. gl |
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| Similar Threads for: Why the higher the stakes, the less rake hurts your win rate? > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| PokerStars VIP Rep thread | 253 | Yesterday 7:28 AM | Poker Rooms | PokerStars VIP |
| Pokerstars changes to WC for VPP's | 6 | 28th December 2011 5:35 PM | Poker Rooms | jbbb |
| Stats at micro vs higher stakes | 1 | 21st August 2011 10:48 PM | Learning Poker | svenoaks |
| micro stakes MTT easier to win? | 10 | 17th February 2011 2:53 AM | Tournament Poker | crabby4 |
| Following fish to higher stakes | 11 | 2nd February 2011 4:56 PM | Cash Games | CerberAcE |
Number of Posts: 7
Number of Authors: 3