What Site is better PokerStars or FullTilt

im not sure if this goes here or not...i hope it does sry if i did something wrong im new here and just getting used to this

well anyways i wanted to know everyones opinion on this....i personally just quit on pokerstars because im very sick of bad beats and i feel like im just wasting money on there but on full tilt i can actually win well even though i just got rivered couple of times not 2 long ago. dont some of you ppl feel like ps is rigged sometimes? like sometimes i can guess the exact that will come well i do that a lot of times like when im watching my friends play or just watching somebody....also this is out of subject but i play on full tilt and i would like to know how u get passwords to those 5$ tournaments and i really enjoy playing poker with friends and having fun. i get pissed off at bad beats but what can u do...lol thx ev1 waiting for yr guys opinions and plz tell me why

Now that's a silly question. But since I have never playied on PokerStars i'll have to go for FullTilt.
I love watching the pros play on FullTilt.
You were saying something about PokerStars being rigged. I think that's a bit silly 'cause you have Bad Beats everywere, even while playing a real life turnament. Poker isn't like some other card games where the best card(s) win. That's my view.

Take care, S

true im not saying it is rigged...but it just feels that way sometimes u know what im saying?

Yeah, I do. Full Tilt is accused for being rigged too. Like I say'd before, you can't play poker without having Bad Beats.

tottalllyyyy agreee with u there just had a donky call me with like mid pair of Qs vs my pair of A and hits two pair...lol i clearly showed him that i had the A with my bet but w/e i guess lol

I feel the other way around. I could guess the cards on FT, plus it seemed like underpair would always trip up. (44 vs. KK, 4s win). PS has been fine for me. Occassional river hits you, but seems like big pairs hold more often.

I like that PS offers more games, has more players, and lets you have custom pictures. FT's avatars are cartoonish. Plus the "pros" are not always playing as themselves. I saw Chip Jett "playing" on FT, and pokernews reported that he was playing in the WSOP Razz event. I don't think he was playing $1/$2 HORSE on FT from his WSOP table.

i give Fulltilt the advantage to me i think its a better overall site

for me it all depends on the cash out policy of the site. Ive only played on full tilt, and i gotta say i feel REALLY sorry for Americans. Its pathetic how you have to get a third party poker like net teller or what ever to take a percentage of your money in order to cash out. i like party poker, because all i do is click cashout, enter the amount, and in 2 days its in my checking account, nice and simple and no third party. although party poker does take a 2.50 fee, and a month ago it was only a dollar. i suspect they'll continue raising it.

I'd say Pokerstars because you can customize the backgrounds and there are more features on PS then full tilt poker.

Welcome to the forums, bobtiger.

I'll try to head this off before it gets messy . If you are asking which site is less likely to give bad beats, then neither. Bad beats and suck outs occur equally at both sites.

Now if you are asking what we prefer, then it's subjective. I like PS MTT because of larger fields, bigger payouts, and (IMO) satellites that are easier to place in. But I play mainly at FT due to the soft players in the SnGs, and the blind structure in said SnGs. Obviously, I predominately play SnGs.

I couldn't comment on the ring tables, because I rarely play ring... and then only to donk off some chips to fellow CC'ers.

So peoples preference of site is usually a matter of opinion based on what they are looking for in a poker site. And please, please... don't bring up the "R" word again.

Oh, and you need 15 quality posts to play in the buy-in games that CC puts on..