| Party Poker | Titan Poker | PokerStars | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
Poker - Variance, or has something changed to cause this??
|
  |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Other player's graph's won't be of much use to you, except letting you know how they're doing. Everyone will have downswings, upswings, and straight lines.Your different playing styles combined with the different types of players each of you play combined with the good luck/bad luck/good run of cards/bad run of cards against these players combined with the different stakes makes it worse than comparing flavors of apples to oranges.
Since the rake is constantly eating away at everyones chips, you need to be very profitable in a short amount of time and play very weak, predictable, and exploitable players, basically exercising table selection, which is not always guaranteed to be profitable, as you won't always get the right cards/situational flops against them or get outdrawn a whole lot. The only way to answer your first question is to analyze your own hand histories. Study key pots, find leaks where you're calling too much when you're beat or have bad implied odds, look for ways to improve the amount of chips you can get your opponent to put in on every street, etc. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
This question can be answered objectively. The way to do it is to take all session up to your peak. From them, one knows the distribution of profits/losses. Then ASSUMING that nothing has changed, the probability to lose as much as you did can be computed.
I am planning on some day wirting software for my own performance, but I am very busy right now. Nevertheless, if you are interested and send me your data, I will calculate it when I get to it. But I don't promise any time frames. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
i reviewed my hands and have put it down to some core hands running babdly, although my mind set did become a factor.
All thes hands are in my core starting hands except KQs which i only play in mid position or later. before downswing: 88,AKs,AQs,JJ,KK,KQs= $108.80 profit. since downswing: 88,AKs,AQs,JJ,KK,KQs= $51.45 loss Does anyone else see a connection?? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah man, he was just kathy liebertin' with you
i'm surprised nobody really said this yet (although switch hinted at it) but a 4k hand downswing is incredibly tiny and standard, even for exceptional players. 10k downswings are even fairly standard, and much larger is not uncommon. maybe you've been playing a good winning game over this stretch and maybe you've not, but a 4k downswing doesn't mean a lot. just try to review key pots in your mind (or with friends/CC), think about if there was a better way to play it. but don't let it tilt you or otherwise make you stop playing your game. focus on making good decisions and the $ will come |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
variance
whether you're a good player on a bad run in the last 4k hands or a bad player on a good run in the first 9k is up for debate. ![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
But even in the absolute heater, look at hands 22k through 26k. About a 200 BB drop = 400 bb drop. 200/4000 = 20/400 = 5/100 = 5 bb/100 over that 4k hand period.
Oh and to my earlier post, yes of course I was kidding ![]() |
![]() |
|
Similar Threads for: Variance, or has something changed to cause this??
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Moving to a higher level | Boltneck | Poker General | 9 | 01-04-2008 11:44 AM |
| Chris Ferguson's Bankroll Management | tosborn | Poker General | 48 | 22-11-2007 6:03 PM |
| Variance | Welly | Poker General | 8 | 05-01-2007 3:14 PM |
