| This is a discussion on Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; I have noticed that in freerolls about 60% of players registered are sitting out. A few sites have policies about it (like on bodog I ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? I have noticed that in freerolls about 60% of players registered are sitting out. A few sites have policies about it (like on bodog I got my account suspended for sitting out too much) but most sites don't really care if players sit out. Its mostly just in the beginning but you see a lot once you play for hours and finally cash. I, for one, have no problem with players sitting out most of the time. If gives all the players an advantage because they get to collect all there blinds knowing that the sitting out players can't build there stack. Its just what I don't like is when people sit out and profit off it that ticks me off (which I'll admit I have done myself in freerolls). And I also feel that it can ruin the game because its not as fun playing when only 2 or 3 players are actually there. Thats only 2 people who can call and a lot of the time you can't play your good hands because the 2-3 active players fold where with a full table your almost guaranteed a call. So what do you think? Is sitting out good or bad to the game? Last edited by D_russo88 : 12th July 2010 at 4:41 AM. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? | |
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? poker If your talking about building a bankroll from freerolls its really great for you. Alot of the better freerolls like FTPs Fantasy freerolls, some of the Iron Man freerolls, and the Poker Academy freerolls usually have a ton of sitters and if your just looking to cash just take the blinds and play pretty tight. Like everyone else said, sitters = free $$$ |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? poker Quote:
|
|
#12 | ||||
| ||||
| I do agree that players sitting out is great for those there that steal the blinds but there is one situation that drives me crazy. Occasionally, it will be just you and one or two other players and it's not enough for your opponents to steal blinds from the sit outs but they want yours too. I hate that. |
|
#14 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#15 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? poker I think the players that do sit-out are somewhat selfish as most of the freeroll registration limits are reached and many players who would actually play could have had their seats. Also I notice on Pokerstars in particular some people play multiple accounts and sometimes will have 7 or 8 accounts sitting out. This dilutes the prizepool and I assume these people are awful at poker or have entirely too much time on their hands. |
|
#16 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#17 | ||||
| ||||
| I think sit-out's are bad for poker. It makes for a longer tournament waiting for the sitouts to blindout. Also it's not a fair situation when some tables have more sitouts than others. You could be facing a normal full table or all sitouts and everything in between. |
|
#18 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#19 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| Similar Threads for: Sitting Out, Good or Bad to the game? > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Playing Live $1/$2 NLHE Cash Game - Read Me First | 14 | 23rd March 2012 4:55 AM | Learning Poker | Jillychemung |
Number of Posts: 20
Number of Authors: 15