Poll-RushPoker-Should Huds Be Allowed.

#1 29th January 2010, 9:25 PM

Both Hem and PT3 will now work with Rush Poker. Hem is out and PT3 has a beta that will be released soon to the general public.

Do you think that huds should be allowed or should FT make the players anonymous?

Do you think the huds will change the nature of the game? Will it slow down the game as people stop to read there huds?

Me personally I don't want to see huds at rush poker as I think it changes the game to much. The idea was to play the game on the fly. If you allow huds than I can see people becoming hudbots. Not the way it was intended.

#2 29th January 2010, 9:46 PM

I don't really care either way. Ever since I started using PT3 a few weeks ago I have been steadily depleting my BR. I stopped using it this week (just to see what would happen) and I've been winning all week. I think it's a great tool for some people, personally, I prefer going by my own feel - it's what works for me.

#3 29th January 2010, 9:52 PM

The first/only "don't care" vote is from me.

It's not that I don't think it matters, I just don't think the pros/cons for either seriously outweigh the other.

Yes, it slows down the game. The game will still be insanely fast and if it's not fast enough, play more tables.

I think HUDs probably increase the edge that regs can achieve but does mean that they can't play completely exploitive poker and have to take a slightly more balanced approach. I think it's too early to tell if this will overall negativelly or positively effect the people trying to make money off of rush.

#4 29th January 2010, 10:13 PM

Rush poker is a nit fest these days. I see it going the way of the dodo bird. HUDs will not kill nor save it.

#5 29th January 2010, 10:43 PM

kill the huds and get rid of screen names

#6 29th January 2010, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dan

kill the huds and get rid of screen names

Full Tilt is coming out with that next month, its called Blind Poker. Btw I voted yes for huds... if i had a hud i would use it... it would be hypocritical to vote otherwise.

#7 31st January 2010, 8:47 PM

I voted for them, but I wouldn't have a problem if the sites banned them for all the games. As long as they are legal, I'll continue to use them. Your giving up too much of an edge, otherwise.

#8 31st January 2010, 8:56 PM

blind poker?

: Should Huds be Allowed in Rush Poker?
NO Huds		19.05%
Yes-Huds Should be Allowed		47.62%
Don't Care		28.57%
What are Huds?		4.76%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Similar Threads for: Texas Hold'em Poker > Poll-RushPoker-Should Huds Be Allowed.
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
who uses HUDS? And where to get one?	ramdeebam	Poker Software & Tools	1	10th October 2010 5:05 AM
Folding AA preflop - poll reopened 2 !!!	Ronaldadio	General Poker	1	22nd July 2007 2:24 PM

Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker \| Poll-RushPoker-Should Huds Be Allowed.
Full Tilt Poker is one of the top poker sites online. [Note: No US Players Accepted] With Full Tilt referral codes like CC600 you get a $600 bonus.	PokerStars is one of the best places to play poker online that accepts US players. Use PokerStars marketing code CCHAT for a $600 bonus. Note: No US Players Accepted.