| Titan Poker | Party Poker | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
Poker - PokerTracker VS PokerOffice
|
  |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
PokerTracker VS PokerOffice
Which one is better? why?
|
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yea I have to believe that PT is pretty much the industry standard. If you ever read any articles online involving your stats or anything, it more than likely references PT. My self this is the first I have heard of Poker Office?
Must be someone that loves Micro$oft |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think one of the reasons (the very biggest one?) a lot of people uses Poker Tracker is because it was the first tracking software on the market and because of that they obviously didn't have any competition. I guess what I'm trying to say is that people tend to stick with what they're used to.
Poker Office's user base have grown a lot bigger the last year from what I can tell from message boards. I started of using Poker Tracker, but later decided to go for Poker Office. Mostly because I think it's easier to use and it has everything, such as a graphing tool and a HUD, built in. Last edited by cascat : 13-02-2007 at 1:01 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
PT is certainly a lot better known, and is the one I use myself. However, I have been told by a serious player whose opinion I respect that Poker Office is a better product and I have been thinking about making the switch.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Poker Tracker is better it shows you were your leeks are and also shows.
Play back card by card when you go to hand history play back hand option . Poker tracker is awsome and simple to use. It will make you a better player in a short time once you review your play in the hand history replay options |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Im also thinking about getting one of these, do either of them support bodog?
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yep, the current version of PT has an import button for Bodog.
In order to actually use it, you need the "Dogwatch Handgrabber" add-on module. I have the module in the demo version but haven`t actually used it. The demo version is so heavily crippled as to be almost useless, and I don`t fancy paying the fee until I`ve seen it work. I`d be interested to hear from anyone who has got it working, as to what they think of it. I play Bodog a lot, and will shell out for the module if it actually does the job efficiently. I`m told that one of the key benefits of Poker Office is that it`s a fully complete and integrated piece of software and requires none of this juggling with add-on bits. Even the HUD is built in. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
I did try both and prefer PO .... no additional software and it`s easier to use as alreday posted. Especially because they had couple of updates and did include iPOKER, PrimaSkins and back in December Crypto Rooms .. works fine to me
|
| Similar Threads for: Poker > PokerTracker VS PokerOffice | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PokerTracker question | Bombjack | General Poker | 4 | 08-12-2006 12:01 AM |
| PokerOffice (or PT): What's your favourite overlay stats? | doodydota | Poker Rooms | 0 | 05-12-2006 3:48 PM |
| PokerOffice questions | myxiplx | General Poker | 1 | 03-12-2006 7:07 PM |
| Is POKERTRACKER worth $55? | MrSticker | General Poker | 15 | 30-01-2006 7:02 PM |
| i need a mac version of pokertracker or something | scrawnybob | General Poker | 2 | 13-10-2005 2:35 PM |
