Is OPR accurate?

I've seen some strange things on OPR, like apparently a winner-take-all $33 R tournament on Stars ($14,300 win). Is there any such thing? Check out a player named WOLTAS. For the last 120 days, he is ranked 3rd out of 691,330 players. What are all those $14,300 wins showing up in his stats, with several different buy-in amounts? Just looks wrong to me. Can you trust OPR?

In addition, it doesn't seem like you can put too much stock in the number even if it is accurately reported. Many winning players would be losing players if you just remove 1 or 2 big cashes from their statistics, which is clearly within normal variance. Seems to me that a 99% rated player could have just gotten lucky once or twice to get that rating, otherwise they'd be in the bottom 50% of players.

Satellites to the PCA, imo.

http://www.pokerstars.com/caribbean-adventure

Yeah, that's probably it. I forgot about satellites all having the same 1st prize.

What about OPR overall? Do you think it's accurate?

Fairly accurate. They claim to cover 97% of PokerStars' S&G's and 99% of FullTilt's S&G's, 99% of their MTT's.

Of course, missing 3% of games means missing thousands of games. It all depends on how well you did in the games it missed. I guess it's conceivable to have mediocre finishes in 50 recorded sessions, then it misses the 51st game where you have a massive cash.