How many games are you comfortable multi-tabling and why?

Up to 4 for me, mainly because this laptop will get overwhelmingly crowded with so many windows. Also- only tournaments. Personally suck at cash games and generally avoid them

4 tables zoom,9 tables reg,and i dont know 4-6 mtt/sng.... Anything more than 9 is small.... And i can easily missclick...
I play 4 tables mtt on phone...

Sent from my HTC Desire X using Tapatalk

I keep records of my multitabling. I do best on 2 tables and 4 tables. The definite worst is 6 tables. I can't explain why.

I do better on 2 or 4 tables. 6 tables is definitely my worst. I wish I knew why.

Tried playing 5 sit and goes at once doesn't work for me 2 tables at one time is best need too process information a at slower pace how you can play 24 at one time is beyond me wouldn't you time out at some point in your play

6MAx Cash prob 4tables feel comfortable. for full ring tournaments or SNGs maybe up to 6, otherwise eyes start going funny lol

I moved up to 2-3 tables at first for the same reason as trolaAa... so I would stop going on tilt playing way too many hands just to get some action. With 2-3 I'm in a hand often enough to keep me focused on the game. More than that right now and I start making bad decisions. I think after another 40K-60K hands I will have more experience to be able to make quicker correct decisions and can move up in tables again to help increase my $/hr and also decrease variance. CardKing777 - if you can make 4bb/100 hands playing one table, and play almost as good playing two tables (lets say 3bb/100 hands) why wouldn't you? In my case I was losing money playing one table but making money playing two or three, so seems like a no-brainer.

2 for me! 4 is probably my max amount. I do understand why people multi table a lot of tables but then it just starts to become retarded and annoying when u have Two or three monitors full of tables....I had AA go into the muck when I first tried multi tabling more than 10 tables once because I was unaware it was my move on that table (TICK TICK) Fold!!!! Sigh.....

I feel comfortable playing 5 tables maximum in order to have time to think of all

SittinPerty said:

2 for me! 4 is probably my max amount. I do understand why people multi table a lot of tables but then it just starts to become retarded and annoying when u have Two or three monitors full of tables....I had AA go into the muck when I first tried multi tabling more than 10 tables once because I was unaware it was my move on that table (TICK TICK) Fold!!!! Sigh.....

Click to expand...

Lol,why did you try 10? I started with 2, than 4 than 9... 9 only for regular tables... For zoom 4 are ok... If you play tournaments its not a problem having 6+ tables... Ah it all depends from person to person i guess....
I dont like slow play for example...

Sent from my HTC Desire X using Tapatalk

4 MTT's is my limit. Couple of reasons. First I cannot keep up with what is going on in any more than 4 and second because 4 tables fit very nicely onto my screen without having to worry about tables popping up all over the place.

Just 4 tables for me... Because poker need concentration and I think that 4 tables are the ideal...

it depends on how manycomputers you play
I play on 2 computers and play on each +- 8 tables
but I starting out on 2 tables per computer
and than you bild up by the years you play

I'm currently working to get myself to 4 full ring games at once, playing two 6-max tables at a time. I didn't see the value of it before and played one table exclusively, thinking I'd be more focused and play better. At micros though, volume > fancy, thought out plays.

4 table is good for me , otherwise i feel overwhelmed and make bad decisions. if you are Multi-tabling , you can't play your best game, i recommend for new players first to specialize only one table , then if they feel comfortable they can add more table.

I play two tables pretty well, if I am alone in my house.

I'm still at one table. I tried 2 and 3 for a bit. It was easier to not get bored for sure but I didn't feel comfortable at it.

For me it is 3 or 4. Mainly because I am a U.S. player, and certain sites have good games that run at the same times.. Forcing me to play 3-4 games, because they all run at the same time. I also feel like I play better, and am able to pay more attention to each table, if I limit myself to 3-4 tables.. Anything over that, and my attention span decreases making it very difficult devote adequate attention to each game.

2 tables seems to be about my going speed I like to take time and weigh my options and I find myself slipping and missing bets if i have more than 2. i tried 5 one time and it was not a pretty site i believe i lost all of them badly from quick and not smart plays

I'm most comfortable with 6, or atleast I prefer it, but I seem to be more profitable and have less variance when playing 4 or 5 tables.

If I am playing low stakes, I do not mind multi-tabling 2-3 tables...but if I'm playing a high stakes or at least taking the tournament more seriously, i stick to 1 table at a time.

Four tables for me, solely because I like all tables visible at the same time. Fast/6max/9, all four.

chuG said:

Four tables for me, solely because I like all tables visible at the same time. Fast/6max/9, all four.

Click to expand...

That usually hurts my eyes, stacking tables works best for me.

Just because i'm a rookie and just starting to play online, I can only handle two hands. When they both are ready for me to bet pre-flop, it gets quite difficult. I imagine how others feel with 8-10 tables... lol

I like to keep it 4 & under. But I'm a tournament player,the action gets aggressive when blind get high and you have to make quick decisions.Cash games I hardly ever play them.