| Party Poker | Titan Poker | PokerStars | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
Poker - Hold'em Manager
|
  |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Release 2
|
|
|
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You could march through all your hand histories, and eventually stumble on a leak to work on, but have you ever done that for more than several hands? Didn't think so. These programs are designed to make the task easier, providing you the opportunity to plug the leaks YOU FIND! Emphasis on YOU FIND! Hopefully HEM, or PO will match what has been suggested PT3 will offer, a comprehensive Bankroll Management feature. To me, this is the most important feature and major reason I have PT3. I'm too dam lazy to have a notebook next to my computer and actually use it. |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
The latest beta is even more stable, and seems faster. For me anyway.
I have not run it past 3 tables. I'm a tourney guy, and don't (generally) play FR. |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Good to see an alternative to Poker Tracker being discussed. I might have to try out the trial as well. |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've used the 5k hands limitation already, there were some hands still in the Stars HH file, so only got to play like 800 hands at 18 tables. Totally lag free, it was a dream tbh. My concern is if the lag will commence if the database is huge. Think I'm gonna be buying this fwiw.
|
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But that's my personal experience. I was thinking of making a post about this, and I still might. But I found that I do substantially better without PokerTracker running. I think maybe it forces me to pay more attention. |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just downloaded it and im trying the trial and it looks very good,i doubt i will buy it since i dont play much ring but can some one tell me how my stats look.
$/Hr -VPIP --- pfr ---3bet% -Agg factor-- WTSD% --won at SD 4.25- 22,3%- 14,7% -6,1 ----4,7 ---------22,6 ------55 This is a tiny sample but can some one explain to me what these stats say about me? |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Stats look decent sindri. We can't give you some kind of big analysis based on those stats (esp with a small sample size), but it looks like you're playing a winning game.
I just finished importing my whole database (~160k hands, ~1 hour) minus the <10k FLHE hands. HM is getting a little slow It's not brutal or anything, but it's a little discouraging. Hopefully the hud runs smooth still.....Going to reboot my PC and see if it speeds up. I've been running a lot of stuff lately; maybe clearing the caches and all that bunk will quicken things up. Stealth brag: June is teh sick. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd like to definitely see a report. I agree ... I am also getting fed up with the non-updates to PokerTracker3. The HUD is indeed buggy and is causing everything to lag after a while, and I only do 6 tables MAX. Obviously I would be willing to switch if something was more reliable and didn't cause things to be slowed down.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
so i just downloaded the trial, about to test it out. a nice non buggy hud would be nice. pt3 doesnt lag for me, its just randomly quits. plus this is cheaper. |
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just played 800 hands (8 tables) and the HUD was rock solid. I just wish I liked the program more. Something about the look and feel is just off. I don't know maybe it's the fact that I've already paid for PT3 that's effecting my opinion. I'd definitely recommend people try it, but I think I'm going back to the buggy POS that is PT3.
|
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol at cliff notes on 2 pages, umm basically try out HEM and if you like it and haven't bought PT3 yet consider getting it instead because basically it's similar if not better in function to PT3 and it doesn't have all the bugs and the HUD (apparently) works even with mass multitabling. I'm about to test that out, just did a bunch of stuff to try to speed up my computer, I'll let y'all know how it goes.
|
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well HEM failed my 20-table test, made it fine through ~12 when it started to get worse and at 20 it was simply unplayable. Still fared much better than PT3 and I've made a post in the HEM forum to try to get help, so we'll see. I'll update on what I find out.
|
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
What site you at? It's illegal to data-mine on Stars, so it won't do it there. Haven't played anywhere else so hopefully someone else will answer if you're somewhere else like FT.
|
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'll open 20 random Full Tilt Poker tables later and see how it goes |
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
While it is still running smooth for me, I guess I could see why it lags others.
It is taking 20% of my CPU (I have 2 cores, so 40% if I had 1 core). Plus another 100MB of ram. For most people that is probably a lot of CPU usage...if you want to check just press CTRL+ALT+Delete |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
OMG!!!!!
HEM is the dogs bollocks!!!! 20 tabled for over an hour, not one single crash and zero f***king LAG. ![]() Woooow my month just got a whole lot better, now if only I could win some poker moniez! ![]() |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow really? what kind of computer do you have and processor/RAM and all that stuff? As mentioned for me ~12 got a little laggy and by 20 it was unplayable.
|
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
17" laptop, intel core duo 2ghz, 2gb ram,320 gb HDD. It's about 4 months old.
|
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, when I tried 20-tabling 2nl it failed miserably. Just every time it imported a hand the entire screen would sort of refresh and take a few seconds and with that happening every few seconds basically I had very little time where it was not lagging. At ~12 everything was fine though. Been doing everything I can in the last 24 hours to get my computer to go faster, figured that must be the problem since everyone else seems to run it so smooth and I've got similar stats as you on my laptop (2 GB RAM, 2 GHz, not sure what HDD is or how to check that).
|
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Zach your performance might be related to your video card hardware within your laptop. Some laptops have a real nice solution from ATI or nVIDIA, while others have some horrible Intel based thing that shares memory from your RAM. I think you would see a dramatic difference in the HUD between those two hardware solutions for laptops.
One thing that might help everyone (?) is to update your video card drivers. I have not tested HEM myself yet, I got the HUD working on 1 table and it worked fine (which is obviously no test in itself outside of 'did it work'). |
![]() |
|
Linear Mode