| This is a discussion on Hand Selection: Limit v. No Limit within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; I find myself seeing a lot more flops when i play limit hold 'em because generally i do not have to worry about people behind ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Hand Selection: Limit v. No Limit I find myself seeing a lot more flops when i play limit hold 'em because generally i do not have to worry about people behind me raising a lot. Is this reasoning correct or should I play as tightly as I do in no limit? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Hand Selection: Limit v. No Limit | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| I guess it depends what sort of hands you are playing, but my suggestion would be to play just as tightly as you would at NL. Sure, it's going to cost you less if a player in late position raises you, but the "drip, drip" effect of doing this too often will eat into your profit. The other thing to bear in mind with limit poker is you're not going to get too many monster payouts, so drawing hands are not as easy to justify playing. Lets take 98s as an example. If you get a fovourable flop, you've got a well disguised monster on your hands, with a good chance of doubling up (or better) in NL so you can afford to play this more often in NL as when you get paid off it will justify all those hands you had to throw down. That probably won't happen at limit. My advice would be to play just as tight at limit, and think also about the type of hands that you play. |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| I tend to value suited connectors, small pps, eg, good drawing hands, a little more highly in limit situations, due to the pot odds offered. This is especially true against aggressive opponents when I have a decent read on their betting habits. For example, if I'm in against a player at 6max limit who habitually raises with any ace, or any 2 paint cards, hitting a straight, flush or set can garner huge dividends. The rewards v risk factor is high enough to merit speculating, IMO. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Hand Selection: Limit v. No Limit poker not sure about good limit players, but at least at the low limit tables I play super tight, because there's practically no chance to bluff, at least one person will see it all the way to showdown. On the other hand I practically never play limit (unless you count the H in HORSE, it's probably been at least 6 months since I'm even sat down at the limit tables. |
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| As I recall, in LIMIT you'll need odds (multiple limpers/no raise) before the flop with small PPs and suited connectors. In NL the implied odds allow these speculative hands to be played with less callers or even a small raise. Also, marginal high card hands like AJ & KQ are much more dangerous in NL whereas in limit you may be able to play these for a profit. goldog |
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Hand Selection: Limit v. No Limit poker Quote:
|
| Similar Threads for: Hand Selection: Limit v. No Limit > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| From the Vault: Why I play Limit Games | 6 | 9th April 2012 9:57 PM | Cash Games | c9h13no3 |
Number of Posts: 8
Number of Authors: 7