Amazing Lay Down

I have AQ of diamonds, flop comes AAK. Check the set, he checks. Turn is a 10 of spades. I bet and he raises and I reraise, and he thinks for awhile. And he tells me in the chat box "I have pocket Kings." Of course I dont respond back. He types in there "I have you on AK and I know I dont have a chance in hell of winning but it is sort of hard to believe that the case king came out on the flop..................Good BET." And he folds. That is truly amazing.

Were you playing no limit or limit? and for what stakes?

I find it common that people call AQ in their hand and AAK on the flop a set. I call it trips a set would be holding a wired pr and hitting another like the guy holding KK. Maybe it's just me maybe it should be called an "open set". Call me silly but a set with a wired pr is much stronger than hitting an "iopen set" just due to hidden strength factor.

100 + 9 no limit SnG grumbledook

i hate to laydown a pair in a game

thats ridiculous someones lying no kk

You're right, that is a pretty nice lay down

How bout next time you look him in the eye instead of the chat box.... That is stupid no one would lay down pocket K's when the flop comes AAK. If he has you on AK then he is a paranoid kid. Anyways I don't buy it.

Flyin

Yea that pretty savage my man...LOL ur lucky because he had u beat if you didnt know.. he had a full house kings over aces, yo just had 3 aces...so acutally your SUPER LUCKY that he didnt call or keep raising or w/e.....

yeah, just like KGB said, "He lays down a monster" "How the**** can you lay that down?" Good bet indeed.

It would be hard to lay down trips, but if there were enough outs on the board, i could!

I bet he had KQ or KJ and was thinking you wouldnt bet trip aces. Also, having a pocket pair and hitting trips or a "set" is much more lethal because it takes a lot more than common sense to see.

I like that lay down as a matter of fact. Tough, but nice

He says he has KK, but I dont think he was telling the truth. He realized he was beat and tried to make it look like he had a much better hand than he really did have. I'm guessing he had a king or 10 with a low kicker.

Wow that is something. I wouldn't doubt it if it was a super low limit game, what limit was it?

he said it was 100 sitngo tourn with 9 entry....

he got cought with his pants dwn an obvious bluff

if he fold this hand respect lol

But whatever .... It's not our problem

Very nice lay down damn. I would've gone all in without thinking about it.

I've seen it a million times on WSOP. The player that knows he is beat flat out lies eg, raises with 7-2. 2nd player calls with JQ. Flop comes QJ6. 1st player makes it 60K to go. 2nd player raises to $150K. 1st player folds and says he had A-J or somethin.


Alls he ever had was 7-2 and semi big balls!

me- KK flop- AAK me- NOT FOLDING, NO MATTER WHAT....if he's holding AK or even the dreaded AA, I will go down with my boat and not think twice

There is no way in hell he had KK! He would never had talked about his hand (Which is forbidden!) if he flopped a Full Boat. He was trying to get into your head, and was a big bluffer. His raise was because he thought you didn't have an ace. How CAN ANYONE PUT SOMEONE ON A K, WITH HIM HAVING KK and a K on the board.... only one more K in the deck! He was trying to sucker you and got beat. He probably had 2 7.