The Theory of Poker - David Sklansky

This is a discussion on The Theory of Poker - David Sklansky within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; Hi. As I'm a big fan of discussion, and also of reading books, I figured I could try and jumpstart a discussion on books. And ...
Poker Forum - Register
For the best online poker bonuses use pokerstars marketing codes or party poker bonus codes which earns you money as do full tilt referral code and party poker bonus code, referenzcode full tilt poker, code parrainage full tilt coupons which are free for poker games online at US poker sites for winning real money.
Titan Poker Bodog Pacific Poker
Online Poker   Poker Forum > Poker Strategy > Cash Games
SEARCH THE ONLINE POKER FORUMS  


Online Poker Forum

Don't miss our awesome poker strategy section with articles like poker odds for dummies!
Reply
 
 
  #1
7th November 2005, 12:31 PM
F Paulsson
 
The Theory of Poker - David Sklansky

Hi.

As I'm a big fan of discussion, and also of reading books, I figured I could try and jumpstart a discussion on books. And since everything has to start somewhere, I thought Sklansky's "Theory of Poker" to be a decent point of origin.

As the book doesn't present any specific strategies on poker ("play these starting hands", etc), but instead focuses on the very core of the game, it's hard to find good angles for discussion on this book in particular. However, I'll offer this:

I keep seeing people advicing beginners to stay away from this book ("but it's a must-read for experts"), because of the complex nature of its contents.

I disagree, with a disclaimer.

If by "beginner", you mean someone who has never played poker, or maybe only a few hands of 5-card-draw when they were 12, with their dad, then yes, that person would do well to start elsewhere. But if they know the basic rules of poker, this is a good read for anyone.

The problem with this book isn't that it's "difficult" in what it explains, it's just not written in a way that's made for casual reading. But for anyone who's gone to college or read any text-book, it's hardly more complicated than the norm. In fact, the actual math in it is not hard at all. You have to stay focused when you read it, and you need to think about some sections, but I disagree with needing lots of experience before tackling it.

There is one good reason why someone may want to hold off on reading this book, however, but it has nothing to do with the difficulty of understanding what it teaches: For sheer profitability, this book is not going to pay off as much as some other books, early on in your career as a poker player. If you're struggling to break even, and what you really want is something to help you keep your bankroll, then get some other book first, which includes some basic strategies on how and what to play for the variant of poker you're interested in. But if you're looking to build a solid foundation which will help you benefit even more from the other books you'll read, then there's no reason to hold off on buying The Theory of Poker, in my opinion. After you've read it, you'll want to from time to time go back and re-read sections or the whole book. And if you really want to do your homework, you'd do well - while reading a suggested strategy by a different author - to cross check Sklansky's reasoning to see how it fits in. But don't let people scare you into thinking it's too much to muster.
Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | The Theory of Poker - David Sklansky

Full Tilt PokerFull Tilt Poker accepts US players. Use Full Tilt Poker referral code CC600 for a $600 bonus and to play online poker with the pro's.

PokerStarsPokerStars is one of the best places to play poker online that accepts US players. Use PokerStars marketing code CARDSCHAT for a $600 bonus.

  #2
7th November 2005, 6:42 PM
xdmanx007
 
Poker at: Paradise
Quite likely my favorite book on the subject! The main problem with other books is they try to give you a cut and dry way to play certain hands in certain situations which is beneficial to beginning players. Theory of poker takes the approach of applying a theory and using the available information in a hand to determine the BEST way to play, and that the game must be looked at from a longterm perspective not winning each and every hand you play.
  #3
7th November 2005, 6:58 PM
beardyian
 
Online Poker at: Sanity
I have in fact just gotten myself a copy of this as well as Mr Brunsons Super System 2.
Having heard about its leaning towards the Maths more and being very strong in maths myself i look forward to taking over the world soon .

People often overlook the titles though "Theory" and "System" do not expect to become an instant winner these are suggesting the ways that should help you win more often.

After all a cook book wont make the cake well i know what i meant .

IanT
  #4
7th November 2005, 7:24 PM
F Paulsson
 
If poker books were cook books, Theory of Poker explains what happens to the meat when you turn up the heat.
  #5
8th November 2005, 11:14 PM
KidHavok
 
Online Poker at: Fulltilt
Game: omaha
re: The Theory of Poker - David Sklansky

I have about 10 poker books and i hate to say this, but I have only learned from about 3 pages on information from any 1 book. I agree with the statment made earlier, the books are so unsituational. It is really hard to find a book that makes you a winnner automatically. No book can do that, only losing $K's can really help you understand situational poker. Another thing the book's have totally missed is the way to win real money.... How to play when your table is on TILT!!!!!!!! I dont know how to do it, unless its just the ram and jam way...
  #6
9th November 2005, 12:53 AM
Grumbledook
 
Poker at: Fulltilt
Game: HORSE
This is one book that I keep going back and rereading, that and his tournament poker book.
 




Players Only Poker
DEPOSIT USING CREDIT CARDS - GET A $1000 BONUS - US FRIENDLY SITE!

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 7:09 PM.



Poker Sites
Copyscape   Poker En Ligne Online Poker Poker Online
All original site contents ©Cardschat.com 2004-2010. Reproduction is prohibited.