| Party Poker | Titan Poker | PokerStars | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
Poker - Sit and Go strategy
|
  |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sit and Go strategy
I've played a few Sit and Gos recently where the following situation comes up:
3 players left...2 large stacks (~6000-7000) chips) and 1 short stack(<1000). Blinds 100-200 I'm Dealt AQ on the button. I'm one of the 2 big stacks. I bet 600 SB (short stack) comes over the top and raises all in to 800 BB (other big stack) calls. I call. Flop Q-J-6 rainbow. SB is all-in already BB checks We? In any other situation I raise it up about 3/4 pot, but what I've also considered is that if I check and keep the other big stack in I increase the chances of knocking out the short stack. What I mean by that is, if the turn and river help the short stack somehow and he ends up beating my TPTK there is still a chance that the other big stack could knock him out, thereby guareteeing me at least 2nd place. So sometimes there seems to be a mutual agreement between the big stacks to just check it down to the river and hope one of us knocks out the short stack. Is this good strategy? Or should I be raising to get more action or a fold from the other big stack? Thanks, Toad |
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tourney situations - "Checking it down" vs "Raising to isolate" should help.
As for the hand, I don't think betting or checking down would be a terrible mistake here. Haven't played stts in a while so I unfortunately don't have much to say, sorry. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm assuming if you're down to three then you're already in the money?
I don't think there's such a big need to check the hand down just to knock a player out once you're in the money - I'd figure you're justified in betting and trying to build up a lead for the heads up portion of the game, seeing as how everybody's getting paid anyway. |
![]() |
|

